| Message |  | Author | 
        
			| 
				
				
				  by wolverine » Tue Jun 10, 2014 1:52 am
 
 Don't be so sensitive. This is the Internet after all... 
 
 | 1 | wolverine Capo Bastone 
					Karma: 340.68 (13518 thanks)Joined: Thu Sep 05, 2002 8:26 am
 Posts: 3968
   | 
		
			| Tue Jun 10, 2014 1:52 am | 
					
					   | 
	
	
		|  | 
	
			| 
				
				
				  by atefooterz » Tue Jun 10, 2014 1:54 am
 
 Where i live the local girls have 2 or 3 guys a night let alone a few months, the others are virgins so it evens out i guess haha. What one needs to look at is what these women are really doing versus the articles & pics linking even a casual chat into the latest romance, anything to sell mags or be click bait. 
 
 |  | atefooterz Santa's Little Helper 
					Karma: 190.73 (26599 thanks)Joined: Sat Nov 22, 2003 2:34 pm
 Posts: 13946
 Location: #nowhereman
   | 
		
			| Tue Jun 10, 2014 1:54 am | 
					
					     | 
	
	
		|  | 
	
			| 
				
				
				  by mickization » Tue Jun 10, 2014 4:51 am
 
 Margot has cracked the top Ten  On Ask men top 99 hot chicks  Beating out the likes of Taylor swift Alyssa Milano kate moss Beyonce  And scarlette johansson kate middleton  Not to sure of the site or what it is but it's reportedly a popular site http://au.askmen.com/specials/2014_top_ ... obbie.html
 
 | 1 | mickization Milhouse Van Houten 
					Karma: 219.48 (2467 thanks)Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2010 1:57 am
 Posts: 1124
 Location: Australia
   | 
		
			| Tue Jun 10, 2014 4:51 am | 
					
					     | 
	
	
		|  | 
	
			| 
				
				
				  by labouchere » Tue Jun 10, 2014 1:07 pm
 
 atefooterz wrote:  .... What one needs to look at is what these women are really doing versus the articles & pics linking even a casual chat into the latest romance, anything to sell mags or be click bait.Exactly   
 
 |  | labouchere Jimbo Jones 
					Karma: 384.38 (738 thanks)Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2011 6:22 am
 Posts: 190
   | 
		
			| Tue Jun 10, 2014 1:07 pm | 
					
					   | 
	
	
		|  | 
	
			| 
				
				
				  by der Meister » Tue Jun 10, 2014 4:32 pm
 
 mickization wrote: Your words 2 to 4 a yr ate If you paid attention you'd see she's had  2 to 4 in a month for awhile
 She dated her ex after dumping him then dumped him for Leo after a month of onset dating
 Got dumped dated some dude
 Then went back to her ex then dated some actor before a dating a kiwi actor twice
 Before dating some dude last month then there's the new guy
 That's more then 2 or 4 a yr
i was replaying to this post. so tell me, which part of this post would indicate sarcasm?
 
 |  | der Meister Milhouse Van Houten 
					Karma: 248.16 (2628 thanks)Joined: Mon Jul 05, 2010 7:51 pm
 Posts: 1059
 Location: Victoria
   | 
		
			| Tue Jun 10, 2014 4:32 pm | 
					
					     | 
	
	
		|  | 
	
			| 
				
				
				  by mickization » Wed Jun 11, 2014 1:54 am
 
 der Meister wrote: mickization wrote: Your words 2 to 4 a yr ate If you paid attention you'd see she's had  2 to 4 in a month for awhile
 She dated her ex after dumping him then dumped him for Leo after a month of onset dating
 Got dumped dated some dude
 Then went back to her ex then dated some actor before a dating a kiwi actor twice
 Before dating some dude last month then there's the new guy
 That's more then 2 or 4 a yr
i was replaying to this post. so tell me, which part of this post would indicate sarcasm?Oh god not again     Okay but seriously that was not a post on Margot herself that was a reply to ate's I think it was  He said she had two or four a yr  I was simply pointing out that it was in a month she has had her last few BF's I was a little ticked off over the replies that I was getting for some reason  When I mentioned sarcasm  I was referring to other posts I made in the past where I had used sarcasm in them
 
 |  | mickization Milhouse Van Houten 
					Karma: 219.48 (2467 thanks)Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2010 1:57 am
 Posts: 1124
 Location: Australia
   | 
		
			| Wed Jun 11, 2014 1:54 am | 
					
					     | 
	
	
		|  | 
	
			| 
				
				
				  by mickization » Wed Jun 11, 2014 2:06 am
 
 Not sure if these were posted If they were you can remove them
 I looked back 4 or so pages
 
 
			
				
					  
					M 634x795 258
				 
			
				
					  
					M 634x407 265
				 
			
				
					  
					M 634x869 294
				 
			
				
					  
					M 634x851 303
				 
 
 | 4   | mickization Milhouse Van Houten 
					Karma: 219.48 (2467 thanks)Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2010 1:57 am
 Posts: 1124
 Location: Australia
   | 
		
			| Wed Jun 11, 2014 2:06 am | 
					
					     | 
	
	
		|  | 
	
			| 
				
				
				  by Tombslayer » Fri Jun 13, 2014 12:48 am
 
 Made it to 22 on Maxim US. 
 
			
				
					  
					M 1257x1632 343
				 
 
 | 2   | Tombslayer Ned Flanders 
					Karma: 505.67 (10255 thanks)Joined: Sat Jul 31, 2004 10:09 pm
 Posts: 2028
 Location: Australia
   | 
		
			| Fri Jun 13, 2014 12:48 am | 
					
					   | 
	
	
		|  | 
	
			| 
				
				
				  by wolverine » Mon Jun 16, 2014 7:04 pm
 
 
 
			
				
					  
					M 634x1039 274
				 
			
				
					  
					S 306x741 225
				 
			
				
					  
					M 634x983 265
				 
			
				
					  
					S 306x664 238
				 
			
				
					  
					S 306x664 221
				 
			
				
					  
					S 306x741 252
				 
			
				
					  
					M 634x1030 237
				 
			
				
					  
					M 634x1035 250
				 
			
				
					  
					M 634x953 237
				 
			
				
					  
					S 306x640 254
				 
 
 | 2   | wolverine Capo Bastone 
					Karma: 340.68 (13518 thanks)Joined: Thu Sep 05, 2002 8:26 am
 Posts: 3968
   | 
		
			| Mon Jun 16, 2014 7:04 pm | 
					
					   | 
	
	
		|  | 
	
			| 
				
				
				  by labouchere » Tue Jun 17, 2014 5:06 am
 
 
 
			
				
					  
					M 830x1200 270
				 
			
				
					  
					M 935x1403 291
				 
			
				
					  
					M 1260x872 338
				 
 
 | 3   | labouchere Jimbo Jones 
					Karma: 384.38 (738 thanks)Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2011 6:22 am
 Posts: 190
   | 
		
			| Tue Jun 17, 2014 5:06 am | 
					
					   | 
	
	
		|  |