AusCelebs Forums

View active topics It is currently Mon May 28, 2018 12:52 pm



Reply to topic 
 [ 4244 posts ] 
Go to page Previous  1 ... 144, 145, 146, 147, 148, 149, 150 ... 425  Next
 Melissa Doyle 
Message Author

Postby nyloninlaw » Sun Dec 12, 2010 5:00 pm


Oh yes please please post it if anyone has it.

By the way , I was looking through some early pages and found this little classic ....

Anyone know WTF was going on with Mel grabbing at her nipples ??

S 680x526 620


Rod Flanders
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 01, 2010 10:19 am
Posts: 168
Karma: 8.93 (15 thanks)
Sun Dec 12, 2010 5:00 pm
Profile

Postby Latino » Sun Dec 12, 2010 5:56 pm


Scott30 wrote:
Yes guys it has been noticeable and is obviously on her mind, maybe because she is now in what they say is the " naughty 40s " she is up for a little slap and tickle from the right person, just wish I were that right person.

Mel I feel is certainly going througha sexy stage in her life and looking fantastic.
Thanks for all the great pics guys.
:ohyes: :ohyes: Mel is smokin hot for sure


I think you're right, it's a clear case of Naughty Forties Syndrome. Kylie Gillies was the same. They both just seemed to all of a sudden (Kylie a bit earlier) get a bit friskier and sexier with their on camera demeanour and looks when they got to this age. Like the sex shackles came off. These women became liberated and sexified.

I think Mel now realises that she could probably get any guy she wants and has more of a roving eye now - not that she would act on these urges or impulses as she's a devout married woman - but she kind of lets us know, in a subtle manner, when she is physically turned on or aroused. She knows now that she could effortlessly grab a more handsome and younger guy than the balding, Mr Average that she married before she was a star.

I am not saying she's shallow. Not at all. But she knows she could just click her fingers and a myriad of good styles of men would be all over her. I think she likes having that seductive power.


Lionel Hutz

Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2004 8:05 am
Posts: 367
Karma: 315.26 (1157 thanks)
Sun Dec 12, 2010 5:56 pm
Profile

Postby modecko » Mon Dec 13, 2010 5:01 pm


nyloninlaw wrote:
Oh yes please please post it if anyone has it.

By the way , I was looking through some early pages and found this little classic ....

Anyone know WTF was going on with Mel grabbing at her nipples ??

Long story short but AC used to have a great capper (probably the best ever) who could get off air footage (his secret). Mel was displaying prominent pokies so was pulling her bra/top out to hide them before she went on air.

That is a correction to an earlier reason I was told and posted that she was adjusting her top to hide the mike cord.


Judge Roy Snyder
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2002 7:42 pm
Posts: 885
Karma: 81.92 (725 thanks)

Location: South Coast NSW
Mon Dec 13, 2010 5:01 pm
Profile

Postby Rutzie » Tue Dec 14, 2010 12:21 am


Sunrise 13/12/10.

M 1024x576 97
M 1024x576 138
M 1024x576 204
M 1024x576 155
M 1024x576 252
M 1024x576 256
M 1024x576 174
M 1024x576 179
M 1024x576 94
M 1024x576 92
M 1024x576 76
M 1024x576 77
M 1024x576 61
M 1024x576 69
M 1024x576 60
M 1024x576 57
M 1024x576 63
M 1024x576 100
M 1024x576 71
M 1024x576 65
M 1024x576 65
M 1024x576 163
M 1024x576 162
M 1024x576 153
M 1024x576 97
M 1024x576 109
M 1024x576 51
M 1024x576 86
M 1024x576 63
M 1024x576 88
M 1024x576 84
M 1024x576 186
M 1024x576 150
M 1024x576 101
M 1024x576 166
M 1024x576 112
M 1024x576 107
M 1024x576 100
M 1024x576 125
M 1024x576 104
M 1024x576 117
M 1024x576 73
M 1024x576 91
M 1024x576 83
M 1024x576 74
M 1024x576 74
M 1024x576 65
M 1024x576 67
M 1024x576 63
M 1024x576 61
M 1024x576 65
M 1024x576 51
M 1024x576 81
M 1024x576 140
M 1024x576 108
M 1024x576 152
M 1024x576 67
M 1024x576 112
M 1024x576 102
M 1024x576 84
M 1024x576 148
M 1024x576 143
M 1024x576 135
M 1024x576 58
M 1024x576 98
M 1024x576 64
M 1024x576 188


Milhouse Van Houten
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2007 9:56 am
Posts: 1229
Karma: 168.59 (2072 thanks)
Tue Dec 14, 2010 12:21 am
Profile

Postby Takk » Wed Dec 15, 2010 10:34 am


08/12/2010

M 1024x576 59
M 1024x576 55
M 1024x576 64
M 1024x576 98
M 1024x576 100
M 1024x576 93
M 1024x576 78
M 1024x576 93
M 1024x576 98
M 1024x576 87
M 1024x576 84
M 1024x576 83
M 1024x576 74
M 1024x576 62
M 1024x576 46
M 1024x576 50
M 1024x576 45
M 1024x576 49
M 1024x576 49
M 1024x576 50
M 1024x576 54
M 1024x576 116
M 1024x576 85
M 1024x576 71
M 1024x576 92
M 1024x576 93
M 1024x576 100
M 1024x576 71
M 1024x576 95
M 1024x576 82
M 1024x576 74
M 1024x576 93
M 1024x576 79
M 1024x576 88


Ned Flanders
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 27, 2009 2:38 am
Posts: 2230
Karma: 51.12 (1140 thanks)
Wed Dec 15, 2010 10:34 am
Profile

Postby ZULU30 » Wed Dec 15, 2010 11:48 am


Stunning absolutely stunning.

Thanks TAKK great set of pics Mel looks so sexy with her hair like this.


Karma: 0.93 (4 thanks)
Wed Dec 15, 2010 11:48 am

Postby kirkbright » Wed Dec 15, 2010 11:58 am


I've been wondering why so many of the pics posted are a lot smaller than they used to be even though the file sizes are the same or larger, so I took one of today's pics of Mel and one from roughly the same time last year.

Now please understand, I'm not complaining in the least, but I am completely baffled . . . it's also important to note that I'm Mac based, so all the talk about different types of video cards for Windows machines means as much to me as the study of sub-atomic particles.

So here you go, the first pic of Mel is from Dec 1 2009 and has a file size of 249.6kB whereas the second is from today and has a file size 33% larger at 371.7kB

But if you check the file size settings of both pics opened in Photoshop CS4* the first shot, with the smaller file size, is actually 350% larger than the second shot which has the larger file size.

Anyone know what causes this? :???:

* The file size information shown in the PNG file relates to the original Jpgs not the posted PNB file - I had to change file type because the site wasn't recognising the original Jpeg with the image size info . . . no idea why

M 1920x1080 696
M 1024x576 310
L 998x558 580
M 728x416 175


Carl Carlson
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jun 14, 2008 5:57 am
Posts: 651
Karma: 16.59 (108 thanks)
Wed Dec 15, 2010 11:58 am
Profile

Postby Takk » Wed Dec 15, 2010 1:55 pm


kirkbright wrote:
I've been wondering why so many of the pics posted are a lot smaller than they used to be even though the file sizes are the same or larger, so I took one of today's pics of Mel and one from roughly the same time last year.

Now please understand, I'm not complaining in the least, but I am completely baffled . . . it's also important to note that I'm Mac based, so all the talk about different types of video cards for Windows machines means as much to me as the study of sub-atomic particles.

So here you go, the first pic of Mel is from Dec 1 2009 and has a file size of 249.6kB whereas the second is from today and has a file size 33% larger at 371.7kB

But if you check the file size settings of both pics opened in Photoshop CS4* the first shot, with the smaller file size, is actually 350% larger than the second shot which has the larger file size.

Anyone know what causes this? :???:

* The file size information shown in the PNG file relates to the original Jpgs not the posted PNB file - I had to change file type because the site wasn't recognising the original Jpeg with the image size info . . . no idea why


You're making a bit of an apples and oranges comparison as the 2 caps you are comparing were posted by 2 different people. If you go back and check my HD caps you will see the file sizes are up near 1MB. When saving jpegs there are a number of parameters you can play around with, the caps you are comparing were saved with different settings which accounts for the different file size.


Ned Flanders
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 27, 2009 2:38 am
Posts: 2230
Karma: 51.12 (1140 thanks)
Wed Dec 15, 2010 1:55 pm
Profile

Postby Rutzie » Wed Dec 15, 2010 11:30 pm


Sunrise 15/12/10.

M 1024x576 133
M 1024x576 68
M 1024x576 67
M 1024x576 53
M 1024x576 63
M 1024x576 48
M 1024x576 65
M 1024x576 52
M 1024x576 58
M 1024x576 67
M 1024x576 61
M 1024x576 67
M 1024x576 73
M 1024x576 117
M 1024x576 189
M 1024x576 147
M 1024x576 59
M 1024x576 59
M 1024x576 56
M 1024x576 117
M 1024x576 52
M 1024x576 58
M 1024x576 64
M 1024x576 54
M 1024x576 114
M 1024x576 80
M 1024x576 66
M 1024x576 48
M 1024x576 51
M 1024x576 44
M 1024x576 50
M 1024x576 108
M 1024x576 73
M 1024x576 75
M 1024x576 104
M 1024x576 79
M 1024x576 76
M 1024x576 58
M 1024x576 57
M 1024x576 55
M 1024x576 63
M 1024x576 55
M 1024x576 57
M 1024x576 119
M 1024x576 50
M 1024x576 169
M 1024x576 74
M 1024x576 72
M 1024x576 80
M 1024x576 78
M 1024x576 303
M 1024x576 103
M 1024x576 96
M 1024x576 52
M 1024x576 84
M 1024x576 82
M 1024x576 97
M 1024x576 100
M 1024x576 57
M 1024x576 220


Milhouse Van Houten
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2007 9:56 am
Posts: 1229
Karma: 168.59 (2072 thanks)
Wed Dec 15, 2010 11:30 pm
Profile

Postby ZULU30 » Thu Dec 16, 2010 3:10 am


Must be so nice to watch the 5 to 5 30 bit without the banner just to look at those legs uninterrupted.

Hope someone watches this morning and gets pics 13 7 16 from last post without banner.

Great work guys
Thanks


Karma: 0.93 (4 thanks)
Thu Dec 16, 2010 3:10 am
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic 
 [ 4244 posts ] 
Go to page Previous  1 ... 144, 145, 146, 147, 148, 149, 150 ... 425  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: mightyreds, Squab and 11 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software for PTF.
.