Message |
|
Author |
by atefooterz » Fri Dec 03, 2010 6:11 pm
Pretty Little Liars - eps 1 & 2
S 1024x576 173
S 1024x576 195
S 1024x576 188
S 1024x576 209
S 1024x576 197
S 1024x576 173
S 1024x576 206
S 1024x576 196
S 1024x576 218
S 1024x576 186
S 1024x576 199
S 1024x576 197
S 1024x576 182
S 1024x576 185
S 1024x576 202
S 1024x576 219
S 1024x576 200
S 1024x576 194
|
|
atefooterz
Santa's Little Helper
Joined: Sat Nov 22, 2003 2:34 pm Posts: 13946 Karma: 190.48 (26564 thanks) Location: #nowhereman
|
Fri Dec 03, 2010 6:11 pm |
|
 |
by locky1 » Sat Dec 04, 2010 6:08 am
Thanks for the great caps
|
|
locky1
Bernice Hibbert
Joined: Sun Aug 19, 2001 1:35 am Posts: 1905 Karma: 9.28 (193 thanks)
|
Sat Dec 04, 2010 6:08 am |
|
 |
by Dreamkitty » Mon Dec 13, 2010 10:37 pm
Tammin Sursok at the Golden Globe event. Is it just me or something off about the first pic? I mean she is really pretty, almost perfect but she looks like like she has had some work done on her face, whats happened to her cheeks? they look so drawn in when she is smiling. It looks like she is working too hard to have the perfect face and body. I hate it when Aussie actresses go to Hollywood and try to get that look. Tammin was a natural beauty to start with, she has the big hazel eyes, cupid bow lips, full cheeks, thick head of hair which always made her look younger then what she really is because of her baby faced looks. But I have this feeling that she is either wanting to get very thin which has resulted in her cheeks dissapearing with prominent cheekbones or she has done some sort of cheekbone implant in that area. Also in this photo she looks flatchested, I don't know if its the angle of the pic or what but I really don't think someone as petite as her would have naturally big breasts. Compare the photo of her in 2003 when she was in H&A, of course she was younger there but her facial structure has changed since then which is a shame because I thnk her face looks much naturally prettier here even though she has less makeup and her hair is not styled.
M 467x600 258
M 379x600 427
S 800x600 255
|
|
Dreamkitty
Todd Flanders
Joined: Thu Jun 05, 2008 7:00 pm Posts: 259 Karma: 3.47 (9 thanks)
|
Mon Dec 13, 2010 10:37 pm |
|
 |
by thegreatgonzo » Tue Dec 14, 2010 5:01 am
There's an 'interesting' new shoot of Tammin in 2 different bikinis and a one - piece. I've only seen it on Rexfeatures' site and they're no great size and watermarked. Don't who did the shoot or for what mag.
|
|
thegreatgonzo
Ralph Wiggum
Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2001 5:24 am Posts: 87 Karma: 11.49 (10 thanks)
|
Tue Dec 14, 2010 5:01 am |
|
 |
by atefooterz » Tue Dec 14, 2010 6:28 am
thegreatgonzo wrote: There's an 'interesting' new shoot of Tammin in 2 different bikinis and a one - piece. I've only seen it on Rexfeatures' site and they're no great size and watermarked. Don't who did the shoot or for what mag. (etc ) rexfeatures.com/search/?kw=tammin+sursock&iso=GBR&viah=Y&lkw=tammin+sursock&stk=N&sft=&search_oldest.x=-1&search_oldest.x=19&search_oldest.y=8&search_oldest=search_oldest does not show up ..just two pics display ...2004 red carpet & clothed Aquamarine pics 
|
|
atefooterz
Santa's Little Helper
Joined: Sat Nov 22, 2003 2:34 pm Posts: 13946 Karma: 190.48 (26564 thanks) Location: #nowhereman
|
Tue Dec 14, 2010 6:28 am |
|
 |
by Dreamkitty » Tue Dec 14, 2010 10:17 am
I went on the Rex website and searched Tammin photos. I could see all the recent pics but you have to be a paid member to view the larger size photos. Anyone know where to get them free? thanks for posting. I think Tammin's boobs are definetly fake, there is no way she would have naturally big breasts. Just look at the shape, they look like rock hard melons! and so perky. I think she needs smallers one to suit her petite bodyframe, it just looks weird. Her body does look great though, she looks better in a bikini then she does with clothes for some reason. And her face looks better when she is on TV.
|
|
Dreamkitty
Todd Flanders
Joined: Thu Jun 05, 2008 7:00 pm Posts: 259 Karma: 3.47 (9 thanks)
|
Tue Dec 14, 2010 10:17 am |
|
 |
by thegreatgonzo » Tue Dec 14, 2010 7:14 pm
Just checked, they're there on Rexfeatures as promised. Just make sure you search NEWEST pics, not OLDEST!!
|
|
thegreatgonzo
Ralph Wiggum
Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2001 5:24 am Posts: 87 Karma: 11.49 (10 thanks)
|
Tue Dec 14, 2010 7:14 pm |
|
 |
by atefooterz » Wed Dec 15, 2010 1:37 am
thegreatgonzo wrote: Just checked, they're there on Rexfeatures as promised. Just make sure you search NEWEST pics, not OLDEST!! Umm yes i did that  rexfeatures.com/search/?kw=tammin+sursock&search_ newest.x=22&search_newest.y=10&search_newest=search_newest&iso=GBR&viah=Y&lkw=&stk=N&sft=&search_oldest.x=-1 same result of 2 old pics ! so are you logged in or not in Aussie ? = maybe different results on location ? When i search for oldest ..it is the same 2 pics but order reversed ..499828i LOV [Download this image now] Tammin Sursock 17 Oct 2004 then 566196bm EVT [Download this image now] 'AQUAMARINE' - Tammin Sursock, Dichen Lachman, Arielle Kebbel - 2006 2006
|
|
atefooterz
Santa's Little Helper
Joined: Sat Nov 22, 2003 2:34 pm Posts: 13946 Karma: 190.48 (26564 thanks) Location: #nowhereman
|
Wed Dec 15, 2010 1:37 am |
|
 |
by thegreatgonzo » Wed Dec 15, 2010 6:49 am
That's weird, I just tap T's name into Search, hit return key and latest 40 ex 245 flash straight up. All recent, November date. There are 7 pages in all, each of 40 thumbs. Dreamkitty can obviously see them - don't know where she is though.
|
|
thegreatgonzo
Ralph Wiggum
Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2001 5:24 am Posts: 87 Karma: 11.49 (10 thanks)
|
Wed Dec 15, 2010 6:49 am |
|
 |
by atefooterz » Wed Dec 15, 2010 2:35 pm
i had better luck uising google rexfeatures.com/live/2010/10/13/tammin_sursok_at_a_screening_in_beverly_hills,_los_angeles ( nice leggy ) rexfeatures.com/live/2010/09/27/tammin_sursok_visits_the_shop_pr_showroom,_new_york,_america?filter=E rexfeatures.com/set/1221425 ............... BUT STILL NO SWIMWEAR Thumbnail PICS !!!!!!!!!!! 
|
|
atefooterz
Santa's Little Helper
Joined: Sat Nov 22, 2003 2:34 pm Posts: 13946 Karma: 190.48 (26564 thanks) Location: #nowhereman
|
Wed Dec 15, 2010 2:35 pm |
|
|