Message |
|
Author |
by RustyNail » Wed Mar 10, 2010 6:00 am
aik wrote: locky1 wrote: She has clearly moved on with her life, but the f'king media have her in their sights as a good beat-up worth a squillion bucks to those leaches called gossip mags that will pay the money for more grainy pictures with half-truth (= /3/4 lies) "stories".
LEAVE HER ALONE. No. She's a dumb, average looking bimbo with no talent and a gold digger. No other reason she's with Clarke apart from what he can provide. No other reason he's with her apart from what he thinks is looks. Nothing in common and she hangs off the back of his career which she has damaged serverely anyway. What makes you so sure the picture wasn't a farce she put into play - just like the Aston Martin. Funny how the pic surfaced quickly after her new wanker of a manager commenced. Sure Fevola may have distributed it, but clearly they knew about it and pounced on it with the leak. We're not all dumb like her.
|
|
RustyNail
Jimbo Jones
Joined: Fri Jul 17, 2009 7:41 pm Posts: 217 Karma: 33.64 (73 thanks)
|
Wed Mar 10, 2010 6:00 am |
|
 |
by bullwinkle » Wed Mar 10, 2010 9:49 am
I'm gunna pull on my rubber boots and wade right in here. Firstly, I've always thought she's reasonably good looking, with great tits. Never thought anything much else about her at all, really. Then this photo comes out, and I felt a bit sorry for her. But I thought she was getting a bit high and mighty, given that she primarily makes a living as a bikini model. So when she said she was gunna sue Fev, I thought that's a bit rich, seeing as we've all seen your bits before. So at this point I'm thinking she's getting a bit big for her boots: this was compounded by her signing with Markson - let's remember that he immediately signed Corey friggin Worthington and the chk chk boom girl.
Now she's sold her story for something like $200k to the very magazine that published the photo. And (allegedly) made her boyfriend come home from a cricket tour, when he's the bloody vice captain of a national sporting team. Sorry, Lara, I'm happy to keep looking at your boobs, but you've lost me.
|
|
bullwinkle
Jimbo Jones
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2001 10:10 am Posts: 230 Karma: 3.91 (9 thanks)
|
Wed Mar 10, 2010 9:49 am |
|
 |
by scooby_smoo » Wed Mar 10, 2010 11:28 am
Does anyone need some cheese with their whine? I believe I saw a rather punchy  vintage around here somewhere if you get my drift.
|
|
scooby_smoo
Monty Burns
Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2001 5:55 pm Posts: 58 Karma: 5.17 (3 thanks) Location: Brisvegas
|
Wed Mar 10, 2010 11:28 am |
|
 |
by bullwinkle » Wed Mar 10, 2010 1:10 pm
Fair enough, aik, that we indeed don't know all the facts. One undisputable fact is that she has agreed to do a story with the very magazine that originally published the photo. You don't see anything remotely odd in that?
|
|
bullwinkle
Jimbo Jones
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2001 10:10 am Posts: 230 Karma: 3.91 (9 thanks)
|
Wed Mar 10, 2010 1:10 pm |
|
 |
by Eddy2 » Wed Mar 10, 2010 2:17 pm
Quote: No. She's a dumb, average looking bimbo with no talent and a gold digger. No other reason she's with Clarke apart from what he can provide. No other reason he's with her apart from what he thinks is looks. Nothing in common and she hangs off the back of his career which she has damaged serverely anyway. And you are? And you know? And this should be given merit as more than nasty trash talk because? The issue with the photo (leaked by whoever) holds a much bigger issue than who deserves what and whether it should have been stopped blah blah blah. It's about privacy and the way intrusive photos such as these completely invade that. Could you imagine opening a paper/magazine and seeing your 19 year old daughter in the shower, looking uncomfortable with a photo being taken by someone she was involved with? It leaves a horrible taste in the mouth.
|
|
Eddy2
Itchy the Mouse
Joined: Tue Feb 16, 2010 12:15 pm Posts: 13 Karma: none
|
Wed Mar 10, 2010 2:17 pm |
|
 |
by wayne1970 » Wed Mar 10, 2010 3:19 pm
I can't believe that nearly three whole pages so far have been taken up talking about this. It's time to move on.
|
|
wayne1970
Monty Burns
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 10:59 pm Posts: 54 Karma: 7.41 (4 thanks)
|
Wed Mar 10, 2010 3:19 pm |
|
 |
by RustyNail » Wed Mar 10, 2010 10:29 pm
Donated to charity? Prove it. Name the charity and I'll make contact myself and confirm she/they in fact did donate. Just like that little pommy fucker who got lost in the blue mountains and instead of donating to help pay for the rescue efforts, took off with the lot. Fucktard. So how is Fevola going to be found guilty of distributing it? "Beyong Reasonable Doubt".Whose to say a mate used his phone, found it and forwarded it to himself and he then did the work. Inconclusive and a good pay day for the lawyers only. and aik, thanks for the critique. Go and hide back under that rock and come out when you understand more about exploiting the media. That's Markson's Trademark, fool.  It's all too coincidental and the more they make of a big deal of it, the more unpopular she becomes than her minute 2 person fan-base she has... and the more his career will take a step back an suffer. It'll get to the point where it places Cricket Oz in a very difficult position where it contradicts his participation. "Disrepute" is the big no no of the game. Summing up, they make a big deal about a phone photo that is fuzzy and reveals little. But the bimbo can participate in a shoot overseas and take decent shots of her tits in the long grass fields. Ethically, one is prostitution... the other is payback topped with contradiction. Zzzzzzzzz... it's pathetic.
|
|
RustyNail
Jimbo Jones
Joined: Fri Jul 17, 2009 7:41 pm Posts: 217 Karma: 33.64 (73 thanks)
|
Wed Mar 10, 2010 10:29 pm |
|
 |
by narly » Thu Mar 11, 2010 8:00 pm
RustyNail wrote: It's all too coincidental and the more they make of a big deal of it, the more unpopular she becomes than her minute 2 person fan-base she has...
3 person fan-base if you don't mind .  you really hate her don't you 
|
|
narly
Troy McLure
Joined: Thu Feb 12, 2004 7:56 pm Posts: 44589 Karma: 496.44 (221358 thanks) Location: Radelaide
|
Thu Mar 11, 2010 8:00 pm |
|
 |
by RustyNail » Thu Mar 11, 2010 9:08 pm
Hate is too strong for my liking.
Screwing half the Carlton team before Fevola got to her did it for me, nothwithstanding my bitter dislike for dumb, bimbo gold-diggers. Take away the 'where the bloody hell are you' and you are left with an average unknown barbie gold-digger.
I know enough people which is where my correct sources are which I've called and some remained silent. Identical to Sarita Stella, you tend to avoid having any remote conversation with a self-obsessed flippant idiot.. even about the bloody weather. "How Much You Paying?" That about sums it up.
|
|
RustyNail
Jimbo Jones
Joined: Fri Jul 17, 2009 7:41 pm Posts: 217 Karma: 33.64 (73 thanks)
|
Thu Mar 11, 2010 9:08 pm |
|
 |
by djmenow » Thu Mar 11, 2010 9:58 pm
Come on guys, can we move on from this and just get off the name calling.
|
|
djmenow
Ned Flanders
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2001 2:29 pm Posts: 2253 Karma: 220.68 (4972 thanks) Location: The Guy In Kate Ritchies Home Video
|
Thu Mar 11, 2010 9:58 pm |
|
|