| Message |
|
Author |
|
 by cmack22 » Sat May 04, 2013 11:41 pm
Kylie Whyte zoo covergirl scans of most recent shoot for Zoo Magazine
(apologies for poor scans best I could do with the equipment I have)
any other photos/scans would be appreciated
M 639x826 803
L 1700x2338 736
M 574x1156 732
M 343x1167 639
M 459x1169 557
|
2
|
cmack22
Selma Bouvier
Joined: Mon Feb 01, 2010 11:14 am
Posts: 42 Karma: 107.14 (45 thanks)
|
| Sat May 04, 2013 11:41 pm |
|
|
|
by cmack22 » Thu Apr 03, 2014 12:44 am
Kylie has also done a video with model Serena bailey for MINX babes in which they both appear topless I am unable to download the video from Serena Bailey's Tumblr page any one who could would be greatly appreciated
|
1
|
cmack22
Selma Bouvier
Joined: Mon Feb 01, 2010 11:14 am
Posts: 42 Karma: 107.14 (45 thanks)
|
| Thu Apr 03, 2014 12:44 am |
|
|
|
by Roundabout » Thu Apr 03, 2014 7:51 am
Links removed at subject's request - admin
|
3
|
Roundabout
Lionel Hutz
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2010 6:42 pm
Posts: 491 Karma: 625.87 (3073 thanks)
|
| Thu Apr 03, 2014 7:51 am |
|
|
|
by Roundabout » Thu Apr 03, 2014 3:58 pm
I was planning on getting some work done today, but instead was looking at pictures of Kylie Whyte.
S 500x429 385
M 776x1080 528
S 720x503 552
L 600x903 499
S 480x720 599
S 520x720 420
S 432x1296 448
M 576x864 578
M 576x864 466
M 600x900 453
M 510x765 428
S 600x889 433
S 344x516 419
S 400x600 399
M 570x900 392
M 280x420 449
M 458x500 380
M 458x500 389
S 458x500 336
S 458x500 347
S 458x500 336
M 683x1024 365
L 735x1024 366
S 393x500 444
S 500x429 443
S 458x500 395
S 458x500 510
S 550x600 422
S 458x500 399
S 458x500 419
S 458x500 348
|
3
|
Roundabout
Lionel Hutz
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2010 6:42 pm
Posts: 491 Karma: 625.87 (3073 thanks)
|
| Thu Apr 03, 2014 3:58 pm |
|
|
|
by phunkyfeelone » Thu Apr 03, 2014 4:07 pm
Airbrushed to the scheizen and certainly not a 'model' (Zoo is NOT modelling, it's bogan chicks in lingerie for tradies to knock one out to in their lunch break). NEXT! 
|
|
phunkyfeelone
Martin Prince
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2004 2:59 pm
Posts: 3296 Karma: 238.38 (7857 thanks)
Location: The Land of Chocolate
|
| Thu Apr 03, 2014 4:07 pm |
|
|
|
by Roundabout » Thu Apr 03, 2014 4:44 pm
phunkyfeelone wrote: Airbrushed to the scheizen and certainly not a 'model' (Zoo is NOT modelling, it's bogan chicks in lingerie for tradies to knock one out to in their lunch break). NEXT! Dude! It's like you know me! you're going to hate my next post then....
|
3
|
Roundabout
Lionel Hutz
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2010 6:42 pm
Posts: 491 Karma: 625.87 (3073 thanks)
|
| Thu Apr 03, 2014 4:44 pm |
|
|
|
by Roundabout » Thu Apr 03, 2014 4:46 pm
Edit: removed
Last edited by Roundabout on Mon Dec 20, 2021 3:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.
|
5
|
Roundabout
Lionel Hutz
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2010 6:42 pm
Posts: 491 Karma: 625.87 (3073 thanks)
|
| Thu Apr 03, 2014 4:46 pm |
|
|
|
by theperson » Thu Apr 03, 2014 5:05 pm
top work mate. The other bird in that shoot is sensational as well 
|
|
theperson
Selma Bouvier
Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2002 10:23 pm
Posts: 30 Karma: 51.61 (16 thanks)
|
| Thu Apr 03, 2014 5:05 pm |
|
|
|
by atefooterz » Thu Apr 03, 2014 5:44 pm
atefooterz wrote: NOTE: This post was reported for nudity: It is now marked as adult content & does not contain "pink bits" that are against the site rules.
NB The previous admin who deleted much of our content did not have any adult filter and was mostly after advert & rankings in contrast to this sites decade+ old agenda! phunkyfeelone wrote: Airbrushed to the scheizen and certainly not a 'model' (Zoo is NOT modelling, it's bogan chicks in lingerie for tradies to knock one out to in their lunch break). NEXT! Maybe you are getting too old for any new content on this site? The generic term Model does not imply Haute couture nor high end print/ fashion models. If i had my own bias i would not allow any model/celeb with tatts or fake boobs, just my opinion and not relevant to the big pool of what is happening out in the world.
|
|
atefooterz
Santa's Little Helper
Joined: Sat Nov 22, 2003 2:34 pm
Posts: 14025 Karma: 190.33 (26694 thanks)
Location: #nowhereman
|
| Thu Apr 03, 2014 5:44 pm |
|
|
|
by phunkyfeelone » Thu Apr 03, 2014 5:58 pm
atefooterz wrote: atefooterz wrote: NOTE: This post was reported for nudity: It is now marked as adult content & does not contain "pink bits" that are against the site rules.
NB The previous admin who deleted much of our content did not have any adult filter and was mostly after advert & rankings in contrast to this sites decade+ old agenda! phunkyfeelone wrote: Airbrushed to the scheizen and certainly not a 'model' (Zoo is NOT modelling, it's bogan chicks in lingerie for tradies to knock one out to in their lunch break). NEXT! Maybe you are getting too old for any new content on this site? The generic term Model does not imply Haute couture nor high end print/ fashion models. If i had my own bias i would not allow any model/celeb with tatts or fake boobs, just my opinion and not relevant to the big pool of what is happening out in the world. atefooterz wrote: Feb 7, 2014 "Are there any commercial shoots, to post for Ellidy? We do have a site rule about models being commercial models  " Surely there's got to be some kind of minimum requirement, I know I've gone down this road before and hit a dead end, but a general assumption of a model would be fashion\cosmetics\TV (ie. game show models) etc., not soft porn strippers for lads mags.  (ate) As previously stated Model is a generic term, take it up with Zoo Picture etc... 
|
|
phunkyfeelone
Martin Prince
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2004 2:59 pm
Posts: 3296 Karma: 238.38 (7857 thanks)
Location: The Land of Chocolate
|
| Thu Apr 03, 2014 5:58 pm |
|
|
