AusCelebs Forums
https://forums.auscelebs.net/

Melissa Doyle
https://forums.auscelebs.net/viewtopic.php?f=88&t=13953
Page 147 of 426

Author:  nyloninlaw [ Sun Dec 12, 2010 5:00 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Melissa Doyle

Oh yes please please post it if anyone has it.

By the way , I was looking through some early pages and found this little classic ....

Anyone know WTF was going on with Mel grabbing at her nipples ??

Author:  Latino [ Sun Dec 12, 2010 5:56 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Melissa Doyle

Scott30 wrote:
Yes guys it has been noticeable and is obviously on her mind, maybe because she is now in what they say is the " naughty 40s " she is up for a little slap and tickle from the right person, just wish I were that right person.

Mel I feel is certainly going througha sexy stage in her life and looking fantastic.
Thanks for all the great pics guys.
:ohyes: :ohyes: Mel is smokin hot for sure


I think you're right, it's a clear case of Naughty Forties Syndrome. Kylie Gillies was the same. They both just seemed to all of a sudden (Kylie a bit earlier) get a bit friskier and sexier with their on camera demeanour and looks when they got to this age. Like the sex shackles came off. These women became liberated and sexified.

I think Mel now realises that she could probably get any guy she wants and has more of a roving eye now - not that she would act on these urges or impulses as she's a devout married woman - but she kind of lets us know, in a subtle manner, when she is physically turned on or aroused. She knows now that she could effortlessly grab a more handsome and younger guy than the balding, Mr Average that she married before she was a star.

I am not saying she's shallow. Not at all. But she knows she could just click her fingers and a myriad of good styles of men would be all over her. I think she likes having that seductive power.

Author:  modecko [ Mon Dec 13, 2010 5:01 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Melissa Doyle

nyloninlaw wrote:
Oh yes please please post it if anyone has it.

By the way , I was looking through some early pages and found this little classic ....

Anyone know WTF was going on with Mel grabbing at her nipples ??

Long story short but AC used to have a great capper (probably the best ever) who could get off air footage (his secret). Mel was displaying prominent pokies so was pulling her bra/top out to hide them before she went on air.

That is a correction to an earlier reason I was told and posted that she was adjusting her top to hide the mike cord.

Author:  Rutzie [ Tue Dec 14, 2010 12:21 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Melissa Doyle

Sunrise 13/12/10.

Author:  Takk [ Wed Dec 15, 2010 10:34 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Melissa Doyle

08/12/2010

Author:  ZULU30 [ Wed Dec 15, 2010 11:48 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Melissa Doyle

Stunning absolutely stunning.

Thanks TAKK great set of pics Mel looks so sexy with her hair like this.

Author:  kirkbright [ Wed Dec 15, 2010 11:58 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Melissa Doyle

I've been wondering why so many of the pics posted are a lot smaller than they used to be even though the file sizes are the same or larger, so I took one of today's pics of Mel and one from roughly the same time last year.

Now please understand, I'm not complaining in the least, but I am completely baffled . . . it's also important to note that I'm Mac based, so all the talk about different types of video cards for Windows machines means as much to me as the study of sub-atomic particles.

So here you go, the first pic of Mel is from Dec 1 2009 and has a file size of 249.6kB whereas the second is from today and has a file size 33% larger at 371.7kB

But if you check the file size settings of both pics opened in Photoshop CS4* the first shot, with the smaller file size, is actually 350% larger than the second shot which has the larger file size.

Anyone know what causes this? :???:

* The file size information shown in the PNG file relates to the original Jpgs not the posted PNB file - I had to change file type because the site wasn't recognising the original Jpeg with the image size info . . . no idea why

Author:  Takk [ Wed Dec 15, 2010 1:55 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Melissa Doyle

kirkbright wrote:
I've been wondering why so many of the pics posted are a lot smaller than they used to be even though the file sizes are the same or larger, so I took one of today's pics of Mel and one from roughly the same time last year.

Now please understand, I'm not complaining in the least, but I am completely baffled . . . it's also important to note that I'm Mac based, so all the talk about different types of video cards for Windows machines means as much to me as the study of sub-atomic particles.

So here you go, the first pic of Mel is from Dec 1 2009 and has a file size of 249.6kB whereas the second is from today and has a file size 33% larger at 371.7kB

But if you check the file size settings of both pics opened in Photoshop CS4* the first shot, with the smaller file size, is actually 350% larger than the second shot which has the larger file size.

Anyone know what causes this? :???:

* The file size information shown in the PNG file relates to the original Jpgs not the posted PNB file - I had to change file type because the site wasn't recognising the original Jpeg with the image size info . . . no idea why


You're making a bit of an apples and oranges comparison as the 2 caps you are comparing were posted by 2 different people. If you go back and check my HD caps you will see the file sizes are up near 1MB. When saving jpegs there are a number of parameters you can play around with, the caps you are comparing were saved with different settings which accounts for the different file size.

Author:  Rutzie [ Wed Dec 15, 2010 11:30 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Melissa Doyle

Sunrise 15/12/10.

Author:  ZULU30 [ Thu Dec 16, 2010 3:10 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Melissa Doyle

Must be so nice to watch the 5 to 5 30 bit without the banner just to look at those legs uninterrupted.

Hope someone watches this morning and gets pics 13 7 16 from last post without banner.

Great work guys
Thanks

Page 147 of 426 All times are UTC + 10 hours
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/