| Message |
|
Author |
|
 by narly » Mon Nov 22, 2010 3:57 pm
S 768x576 505
M 768x576 518
S 768x576 921
S 768x576 290
S 768x576 299
M 768x576 396
|
|
narly
Troy McLure
Joined: Thu Feb 12, 2004 7:56 pm
Posts: 44633 Karma: 496.26 (221494 thanks)
Location: Radelaide
|
| Mon Nov 22, 2010 3:57 pm |
|
|
|
by Kat Pati » Mon Nov 22, 2010 8:20 pm
umm thanks for the unnecessary bosom close-up on picture 14 just there  
|
|
Kat Pati
Itchy the Mouse
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2010 12:35 pm
Posts: 16 Karma: none
|
| Mon Nov 22, 2010 8:20 pm |
|
|
|
by salt » Mon Nov 22, 2010 9:56 pm
Kat Pati wrote: umm thanks for the unnecessary bosom close-up on picture 14 just there
|
|
salt
Milhouse Van Houten
Joined: Sat Jun 30, 2007 12:56 am
Posts: 1496 Karma: 193.25 (2891 thanks)
|
| Mon Nov 22, 2010 9:56 pm |
|
|
|
by Loose Goose » Mon Nov 22, 2010 9:58 pm
Kat Pati wrote: umm thanks for the unnecessary bosom close-up on picture 14 just there Unnecessary bosom close-up?? No such thing! 
|
|
Loose Goose
Elizabeth Hoover
Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2004 4:20 pm
Posts: 140 Karma: 111.43 (156 thanks)
Location: N O W H E R E
|
| Mon Nov 22, 2010 9:58 pm |
|
|
|
by Kat Pati » Tue Nov 23, 2010 11:24 am
Loose Goose wrote: Kat Pati wrote: umm thanks for the unnecessary bosom close-up on picture 14 just there Unnecessary bosom close-up?? No such thing! You guys were just excited because her ... well... let's just say her dress was too tight so her *starts with 'n'* were poking through... But we don't need to see a close-up!
|
|
Kat Pati
Itchy the Mouse
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2010 12:35 pm
Posts: 16 Karma: none
|
| Tue Nov 23, 2010 11:24 am |
|
|
|
by salt » Tue Nov 23, 2010 11:42 am
Cappers can post whatever screen captures they see fit, it's completely at their discretion.
|
|
salt
Milhouse Van Houten
Joined: Sat Jun 30, 2007 12:56 am
Posts: 1496 Karma: 193.25 (2891 thanks)
|
| Tue Nov 23, 2010 11:42 am |
|
|
|
by wolverine » Tue Nov 23, 2010 12:57 pm
Kat Pati wrote: Loose Goose wrote: Kat Pati wrote: umm thanks for the unnecessary bosom close-up on picture 14 just there Unnecessary bosom close-up?? No such thing! You guys were just excited because her ... well... let's just say her dress was too tight so her *starts with 'n'* were poking through... But we don't need to see a close-up! Speak for yourself, I certainly needed to see that 
|
|
wolverine
Capo Bastone
Joined: Thu Sep 05, 2002 8:26 am
Posts: 3962 Karma: 338.87 (13426 thanks)
|
| Tue Nov 23, 2010 12:57 pm |
|
|
|
by Reb » Tue Nov 23, 2010 2:00 pm
Kat Pati wrote: Loose Goose wrote: Kat Pati wrote: umm thanks for the unnecessary bosom close-up on picture 14 just there Unnecessary bosom close-up?? No such thing! You guys were just excited because her ... well... let's just say her dress was too tight so her *starts with 'n'* were poking through... But we don't need to see a close-up! yes , we do  That's the whole point of this site  pity narly's pics weren't HD
|
|
Reb
Mary Bailey
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2001 3:39 pm
Posts: 720 Karma: 152.22 (1096 thanks)
Location: The Overflow .
|
| Tue Nov 23, 2010 2:00 pm |
|
|
|
by narly » Tue Nov 23, 2010 3:39 pm
Kat Pati wrote:
You guys were just excited because her ... well... let's just say her dress was too tight so her *starts with 'n'* were poking through...
But we don't need to see a close-up!
Thats exactly what of i was aiming for a close up of her NIPPLE
|
|
narly
Troy McLure
Joined: Thu Feb 12, 2004 7:56 pm
Posts: 44633 Karma: 496.26 (221494 thanks)
Location: Radelaide
|
| Tue Nov 23, 2010 3:39 pm |
|
|
|
by HumphreyBBear » Tue Nov 23, 2010 5:23 pm
...OMFG! Did somebody just say NIPPLE? 
|
|
HumphreyBBear
Otto Man
Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2005 7:45 pm
Posts: 779 Karma: 85.15 (665 thanks)
|
| Tue Nov 23, 2010 5:23 pm |
|
|
