AusCelebs Forums

View active topics It is currently Wed Jul 23, 2025 6:45 pm



Reply to topic 
 [ 635 posts ] 
Go to page Previous  1 ... 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34 ... 64  Next
 Natalie Gruzlewski 
Message Author

Postby pantherz9103 » Wed May 12, 2010 4:27 pm


Natalie was voted No 79 in the FHM 100 Sexiest Women Poll. Her first entry into the poll apparently. About time! Although she should've been much higher of course.


Ralph Wiggum
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 03, 2010 10:41 pm
Posts: 81
Karma: 2.47 (2 thanks)
Wed May 12, 2010 4:27 pm
Profile

Postby hearsz » Thu May 13, 2010 9:05 am


For the full list, go to: http://www.fhm.com.au/fhms-100-sexiest- ... allery.htm

Be warned, there are some absolute shockers in there, especially when you weigh them up against some of our faves here on the forum..


Hearsz :grin:


Lionel Hutz
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 15, 2010 4:02 pm
Posts: 443
Karma: 236.34 (1047 thanks)

Location: Wayward Pines, Zamunda
Thu May 13, 2010 9:05 am
Profile WWW

Postby pantherz9103 » Thu May 13, 2010 10:37 am


I actually bought the magazine just this time for the sexiest women and it had quite a bit of sport. Lady Ga Ga was ahead of Nat? the list fails based on that alone. She wouldn't be anywhere near my top 100. Good that Miranda Kerr & Hawko are high but yeah there are some shockers.

P.S. An interesting link about Natalie. 'Painting Natalie Gruzlewski'

http://www.google.com.au/imgres?imgurl=http://diaryofanartist.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/nat-concept.jpg&imgrefurl=http://diaryofanartist.net/%3Fp%3D53&usg=__rIYktjhvj_3wOALM1GB0A_Xd7G0=&h=208&w=312&sz=77&hl=en&start=140&um=1&itbs=1&tbnid=TSG8VSYur4x51M:&tbnh=78&tbnw=117&prev=/images%3Fq%3DNatalie%2BGruzlewski%26start%3D120%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26sa%3DN%26ndsp%3D20%26tbs%3Disch:1


Ralph Wiggum
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 03, 2010 10:41 pm
Posts: 81
Karma: 2.47 (2 thanks)
Thu May 13, 2010 10:37 am
Profile

Postby hearsz » Thu May 13, 2010 1:18 pm


What gets me pantherz is how celebrities can do f*ck all for the last 12 months and still make the Top 100. (See Delta Goodrem and Holly Valance)

You get people like Melissa Doyle, Georgie Gardner, Sam Armytage and Kylie Gillies (for e.g.) doing their 48 weeks work for the year and not even make the cut...
Hence, why I stopped buying these mags years ago...

Hearsz


Lionel Hutz
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 15, 2010 4:02 pm
Posts: 443
Karma: 236.34 (1047 thanks)

Location: Wayward Pines, Zamunda
Thu May 13, 2010 1:18 pm
Profile WWW

Postby pantherz9103 » Thu May 13, 2010 6:27 pm


hearsz wrote:
What gets me pantherz is how celebrities can do f*ck all for the last 12 months and still make the Top 100. (See Delta Goodrem and Holly Valance)

You get people like Melissa Doyle, Georgie Gardner, Sam Armytage and Kylie Gillies (for e.g.) doing their 48 weeks work for the year and not even make the cut...
Hence, why I stopped buying these mags years ago...

Hearsz


Yeah its only the votes from the FHM readers and most of those women that poll high are quite young and often seen scantily clad which is ok by me but you know that those women you mentioned will not be in a list like this because they are not the kind of women that interest the readers. Nat looks great in a bikini of course although we don't see it all that much, if we did she might get more votes in a FHM poll. I am a genuine fan of Nat and I love the pictures posted on here but also like her as a presenter and yes she does work alot and deserves more recognition just as a person not only as someone who is attractive.


Ralph Wiggum
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 03, 2010 10:41 pm
Posts: 81
Karma: 2.47 (2 thanks)
Thu May 13, 2010 6:27 pm
Profile

Postby hearsz » Fri May 14, 2010 8:38 am


Well said Pantherz...

I suppose I can look at it from a point a view that we here on the forum are the biggest fans who appreciate our news readers & presenters,
and everyone else is missing out!
Also, I reckon there would have to be a certain age group who vote in these lists. I'm 29 and I know 9 years ago I would have certainly overlooked or not even considered the kind of newsreaders I listed on the last post. I am however still skeptical whether people's votes are even counted! I mean, I remember Magda Szubanski made the list one year!! (No disrespect to Magda) And the list is pretty Australian biased every single year, which leads me to believe that FHM have alot of say about who makes the final list.
Funnily enough, if you read the comments listing on that site, there's a lot of pissed off people with the Top 100. At least I'm not the only one who thinks like this! :lol:


Hearsz


Lionel Hutz
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 15, 2010 4:02 pm
Posts: 443
Karma: 236.34 (1047 thanks)

Location: Wayward Pines, Zamunda
Fri May 14, 2010 8:38 am
Profile WWW

Postby narly » Sat May 15, 2010 11:53 am


./.

S 768x576 216
S 768x576 217
S 768x576 152
S 768x576 148


Troy McLure
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 12, 2004 7:56 pm
Posts: 44591
Karma: 496.28 (221297 thanks)

Location: Radelaide
Sat May 15, 2010 11:53 am
Profile

Postby hearsz » Mon May 17, 2010 2:24 pm


My NATALIE "PIC OF THE WEEK" - from Inside Sport 1998

Hearsz :grin:

M 636x922 1001


Lionel Hutz
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 15, 2010 4:02 pm
Posts: 443
Karma: 236.34 (1047 thanks)

Location: Wayward Pines, Zamunda
Mon May 17, 2010 2:24 pm
Profile WWW

Postby pantherz9103 » Thu May 20, 2010 4:07 pm


Just looking at some comments on different websites- How do you think Natalie looks in these jeans? Alot of people have made comments that Natalie should lose these jeans as they are low cut and show her 'boyish' figure. WTH? :???:

Image


Ralph Wiggum
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 03, 2010 10:41 pm
Posts: 81
Karma: 2.47 (2 thanks)
Thu May 20, 2010 4:07 pm
Profile

Postby wolverine » Thu May 20, 2010 4:15 pm


pantherz9103 wrote:
Just looking at some comments on different websites- How do you think Natalie looks in these jeans? Alot of people have made comments that Natalie should lose these jeans as they are low cut and show her 'boyish' figure. WTH? :???:


I like Natalie just fine but I suppose what they are referring to is that her body doesn't have that classic hour-glass shape that most men find appealing.


Capo Bastone
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 05, 2002 8:26 am
Posts: 3959
Karma: 338.90 (13417 thanks)
Thu May 20, 2010 4:15 pm
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic 
 [ 635 posts ] 
Go to page Previous  1 ... 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34 ... 64  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Pliny the Younger, sa1nter and 97 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software for PTF.