Message |
|
Author |
by pantherz9103 » Wed May 12, 2010 4:27 pm
Natalie was voted No 79 in the FHM 100 Sexiest Women Poll. Her first entry into the poll apparently. About time! Although she should've been much higher of course.
|
|
pantherz9103
Ralph Wiggum
Joined: Wed Feb 03, 2010 10:41 pm Posts: 81 Karma: 2.47 (2 thanks)
|
Wed May 12, 2010 4:27 pm |
|
 |
by hearsz » Thu May 13, 2010 9:05 am
For the full list, go to: http://www.fhm.com.au/fhms-100-sexiest- ... allery.htmBe warned, there are some absolute shockers in there, especially when you weigh them up against some of our faves here on the forum.. Hearsz 
|
|
hearsz
Lionel Hutz
Joined: Mon Feb 15, 2010 4:02 pm Posts: 443 Karma: 236.34 (1047 thanks) Location: Wayward Pines, Zamunda
|
Thu May 13, 2010 9:05 am |
|
 |
by pantherz9103 » Thu May 13, 2010 10:37 am
|
|
pantherz9103
Ralph Wiggum
Joined: Wed Feb 03, 2010 10:41 pm Posts: 81 Karma: 2.47 (2 thanks)
|
Thu May 13, 2010 10:37 am |
|
 |
by hearsz » Thu May 13, 2010 1:18 pm
What gets me pantherz is how celebrities can do f*ck all for the last 12 months and still make the Top 100. (See Delta Goodrem and Holly Valance)
You get people like Melissa Doyle, Georgie Gardner, Sam Armytage and Kylie Gillies (for e.g.) doing their 48 weeks work for the year and not even make the cut... Hence, why I stopped buying these mags years ago...
Hearsz
|
|
hearsz
Lionel Hutz
Joined: Mon Feb 15, 2010 4:02 pm Posts: 443 Karma: 236.34 (1047 thanks) Location: Wayward Pines, Zamunda
|
Thu May 13, 2010 1:18 pm |
|
 |
by pantherz9103 » Thu May 13, 2010 6:27 pm
hearsz wrote: What gets me pantherz is how celebrities can do f*ck all for the last 12 months and still make the Top 100. (See Delta Goodrem and Holly Valance)
You get people like Melissa Doyle, Georgie Gardner, Sam Armytage and Kylie Gillies (for e.g.) doing their 48 weeks work for the year and not even make the cut... Hence, why I stopped buying these mags years ago...
Hearsz Yeah its only the votes from the FHM readers and most of those women that poll high are quite young and often seen scantily clad which is ok by me but you know that those women you mentioned will not be in a list like this because they are not the kind of women that interest the readers. Nat looks great in a bikini of course although we don't see it all that much, if we did she might get more votes in a FHM poll. I am a genuine fan of Nat and I love the pictures posted on here but also like her as a presenter and yes she does work alot and deserves more recognition just as a person not only as someone who is attractive.
|
|
pantherz9103
Ralph Wiggum
Joined: Wed Feb 03, 2010 10:41 pm Posts: 81 Karma: 2.47 (2 thanks)
|
Thu May 13, 2010 6:27 pm |
|
 |
by hearsz » Fri May 14, 2010 8:38 am
Well said Pantherz... I suppose I can look at it from a point a view that we here on the forum are the biggest fans who appreciate our news readers & presenters, and everyone else is missing out! Also, I reckon there would have to be a certain age group who vote in these lists. I'm 29 and I know 9 years ago I would have certainly overlooked or not even considered the kind of newsreaders I listed on the last post. I am however still skeptical whether people's votes are even counted! I mean, I remember Magda Szubanski made the list one year!! (No disrespect to Magda) And the list is pretty Australian biased every single year, which leads me to believe that FHM have alot of say about who makes the final list. Funnily enough, if you read the comments listing on that site, there's a lot of pissed off people with the Top 100. At least I'm not the only one who thinks like this! Hearsz
|
|
hearsz
Lionel Hutz
Joined: Mon Feb 15, 2010 4:02 pm Posts: 443 Karma: 236.34 (1047 thanks) Location: Wayward Pines, Zamunda
|
Fri May 14, 2010 8:38 am |
|
 |
by narly » Sat May 15, 2010 11:53 am
./.
S 768x576 216
S 768x576 217
S 768x576 152
S 768x576 148
|
|
narly
Troy McLure
Joined: Thu Feb 12, 2004 7:56 pm Posts: 44591 Karma: 496.28 (221297 thanks) Location: Radelaide
|
Sat May 15, 2010 11:53 am |
|
 |
by hearsz » Mon May 17, 2010 2:24 pm
My NATALIE "PIC OF THE WEEK" - from Inside Sport 1998 Hearsz 
M 636x922 1001
|
|
hearsz
Lionel Hutz
Joined: Mon Feb 15, 2010 4:02 pm Posts: 443 Karma: 236.34 (1047 thanks) Location: Wayward Pines, Zamunda
|
Mon May 17, 2010 2:24 pm |
|
 |
by pantherz9103 » Thu May 20, 2010 4:07 pm
Just looking at some comments on different websites- How do you think Natalie looks in these jeans? Alot of people have made comments that Natalie should lose these jeans as they are low cut and show her 'boyish' figure. WTH? 
|
|
pantherz9103
Ralph Wiggum
Joined: Wed Feb 03, 2010 10:41 pm Posts: 81 Karma: 2.47 (2 thanks)
|
Thu May 20, 2010 4:07 pm |
|
 |
by wolverine » Thu May 20, 2010 4:15 pm
pantherz9103 wrote: Just looking at some comments on different websites- How do you think Natalie looks in these jeans? Alot of people have made comments that Natalie should lose these jeans as they are low cut and show her 'boyish' figure. WTH? I like Natalie just fine but I suppose what they are referring to is that her body doesn't have that classic hour-glass shape that most men find appealing.
|
|
wolverine
Capo Bastone
Joined: Thu Sep 05, 2002 8:26 am Posts: 3959 Karma: 338.90 (13417 thanks)
|
Thu May 20, 2010 4:15 pm |
|
|