Message |
|
Author |
by spazzenger » Thu Jan 06, 2011 4:19 pm
Natalie Barr is so boring and not sexy.
|
|
spazzenger
Todd Flanders
Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2005 3:25 pm Posts: 326 Karma: 6.13 (20 thanks)
|
Thu Jan 06, 2011 4:19 pm |
|
![](./styles/serenity/theme/images/spacer.gif) |
by modecko » Fri Jan 07, 2011 6:43 am
Natalie Barr is so interesting and sexy.
|
|
modecko
Judge Roy Snyder
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2002 8:42 pm Posts: 913 Karma: 99.67 (910 thanks) Location: South Coast NSW
|
Fri Jan 07, 2011 6:43 am |
|
![](./styles/serenity/theme/images/spacer.gif) |
by Rexxus » Fri Jan 07, 2011 8:46 am
I have to say that Nat is very sexy, but does not show enough of herself! Mel on the other hand is really sexy, and i do not think you can compare them as they are both sexy women in their own way!!
|
|
Rexxus
Selma Bouvier
Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2010 4:30 pm Posts: 48 Karma: 10.42 (5 thanks)
|
Fri Jan 07, 2011 8:46 am |
|
![](./styles/serenity/theme/images/spacer.gif) |
by wyatt » Fri Jan 07, 2011 8:54 am
Not wanting to turn this into a Nat thread, but she is looking better than usual this morning.
|
|
wyatt
Milhouse Van Houten
Joined: Thu Aug 04, 2005 12:16 am Posts: 1252 Karma: 23.48 (294 thanks) Location: Comfy Chair
|
Fri Jan 07, 2011 8:54 am |
|
![](./styles/serenity/theme/images/spacer.gif) |
by salt » Fri Jan 07, 2011 9:29 am
Will see what segments they air bannerless on Monday morning.
|
|
salt
Milhouse Van Houten
Joined: Sat Jun 30, 2007 12:56 am Posts: 1496 Karma: 190.71 (2853 thanks)
|
Fri Jan 07, 2011 9:29 am |
|
![](./styles/serenity/theme/images/spacer.gif) |
by spazzenger » Fri Jan 07, 2011 11:59 pm
modecko wrote: Natalie Barr is so interesting and sexy. Lol well played. I find her attractive, just wouldn't say I find her that sexy.
|
|
spazzenger
Todd Flanders
Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2005 3:25 pm Posts: 326 Karma: 6.13 (20 thanks)
|
Fri Jan 07, 2011 11:59 pm |
|
![](./styles/serenity/theme/images/spacer.gif) |
by pureg » Sat Jan 08, 2011 9:06 am
Any way back on the subject of mel ![Dribble :dribble:](./images/smilies/icon_dribble.gif)
S 480x640 645
S 480x640 1184
|
|
pureg
Lionel Hutz
Joined: Fri Oct 06, 2006 1:27 am Posts: 374 Karma: 188.50 (705 thanks)
|
Sat Jan 08, 2011 9:06 am |
|
![](./styles/serenity/theme/images/spacer.gif) |
by Xfactor » Sun Jan 09, 2011 7:02 pm
Lack of Mel getting you down ?
Enjoy these from August 2004, previously posted on the old aussiecelebs, never got around to reposting them after several site crashes (could never find the right cds)
M 720x400 682
M 1024x576 430
|
|
Xfactor
Ned Flanders
Joined: Sun May 04, 2003 3:13 pm Posts: 2149 Karma: 58.49 (1257 thanks) Location: Australia
|
Sun Jan 09, 2011 7:02 pm |
|
![](./styles/serenity/theme/images/spacer.gif) |
by Xfactor » Sun Jan 09, 2011 7:06 pm
Keep in mind these are from an era where Channel 7 didn't give a stuff about the digital tv quality (hey it's 2011 and they still don't) ![Razz :P](./images/smilies/icon_razz.gif)
S 720x400 267
S 768x432 212
|
1
|
Xfactor
Ned Flanders
Joined: Sun May 04, 2003 3:13 pm Posts: 2149 Karma: 58.49 (1257 thanks) Location: Australia
|
Sun Jan 09, 2011 7:06 pm |
|
![](./styles/serenity/theme/images/spacer.gif) |
by caps_admirer » Sun Jan 09, 2011 10:48 pm
These are excellent caps of rare "historical" value. Is it just me or it seems the set lighting was more subtle, subdued in 2001 than it is now?
|
|
caps_admirer
Milhouse Van Houten
Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2010 5:44 pm Posts: 1113 Karma: 58.49 (651 thanks)
|
Sun Jan 09, 2011 10:48 pm |
|
|