AusCelebs Forums :: View topic

phunkyfeelone wrote:

Airbrushed to the scheizen and certainly not a 'model'
(Zoo is NOT modelling, it's bogan chicks in lingerie for tradies to knock one out to in their lunch break).

NEXT! :no:

atefooterz wrote:

NOTE: This post was reported for nudity: It is now marked as adult content & does not contain "pink bits" that are against the site rules.
NB The previous admin who deleted much of our content did not have any adult filter and was mostly after advert & rankings in contrast to this sites decade+ old agenda!

phunkyfeelone wrote:

Airbrushed to the scheizen and certainly not a 'model'
(Zoo is NOT modelling, it's bogan chicks in lingerie for tradies to knock one out to in their lunch break).

NEXT! :no:

atefooterz wrote:

phunkyfeelone wrote:

Airbrushed to the scheizen and certainly not a 'model'
(Zoo is NOT modelling, it's bogan chicks in lingerie for tradies to knock one out to in their lunch break).

NEXT! :no:

Maybe you are getting too old for any new content on this site? The generic term Model does not imply Haute couture nor high end print/ fashion models. If i had my own bias i would not allow any model/celeb with tatts or fake boobs, just my opinion and not relevant to the big pool of what is happening out in the world.

atefooterz wrote:

Feb 7, 2014 "Are there any commercial shoots, to post for Ellidy? We do have a site rule about models being commercial models :smile:

Author:	cmack22 [ Sat May 04, 2013 11:41 pm ]
Post subject:	Kylie Whyte
Kylie Whyte zoo covergirl scans of most recent shoot for Zoo Magazine (apologies for poor scans best I could do with the equipment I have) any other photos/scans would be appreciated

Author:	cmack22 [ Thu Apr 03, 2014 12:44 am ]
Post subject:	Re: Kylie Whyte
Kylie has also done a video with model Serena bailey for MINX babes in which they both appear topless I am unable to download the video from Serena Bailey's Tumblr page any one who could would be greatly appreciated

Author:	Roundabout [ Thu Apr 03, 2014 7:51 am ]
Post subject:	Re: Kylie Whyte
Links removed at subject's request - admin

Author:	Roundabout [ Thu Apr 03, 2014 3:58 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Kylie Whyte
I was planning on getting some work done today, but instead was looking at pictures of Kylie Whyte.

Author:	phunkyfeelone [ Thu Apr 03, 2014 4:07 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Kylie Whyte
Airbrushed to the scheizen and certainly not a 'model' (Zoo is NOT modelling, it's bogan chicks in lingerie for tradies to knock one out to in their lunch break). NEXT!

AusCelebs Forums https://forums.auscelebs.net/

Kylie Whyte https://forums.auscelebs.net/viewtopic.php?f=87&t=18826	Page 1 of 2

Author:	Roundabout [ Thu Apr 03, 2014 4:44 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Kylie Whyte
phunkyfeelone wrote: Airbrushed to the scheizen and certainly not a 'model' (Zoo is NOT modelling, it's bogan chicks in lingerie for tradies to knock one out to in their lunch break). NEXT! Dude! It's like you know me! you're going to hate my next post then....

Author:	Roundabout [ Thu Apr 03, 2014 4:46 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Kylie Whyte
Edit: removed

Author:	theperson [ Thu Apr 03, 2014 5:05 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Kylie Whyte
top work mate. The other bird in that shoot is sensational as well

Author:	atefooterz [ Thu Apr 03, 2014 5:44 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Kylie Whyte
atefooterz wrote: NOTE: This post was reported for nudity: It is now marked as adult content & does not contain "pink bits" that are against the site rules. NB The previous admin who deleted much of our content did not have any adult filter and was mostly after advert & rankings in contrast to this sites decade+ old agenda! phunkyfeelone wrote: Airbrushed to the scheizen and certainly not a 'model' (Zoo is NOT modelling, it's bogan chicks in lingerie for tradies to knock one out to in their lunch break). NEXT! Maybe you are getting too old for any new content on this site? The generic term Model does not imply Haute couture nor high end print/ fashion models. If i had my own bias i would not allow any model/celeb with tatts or fake boobs, just my opinion and not relevant to the big pool of what is happening out in the world.

Author:	phunkyfeelone [ Thu Apr 03, 2014 5:58 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Kylie Whyte
atefooterz wrote: atefooterz wrote: NOTE: This post was reported for nudity: It is now marked as adult content & does not contain "pink bits" that are against the site rules. NB The previous admin who deleted much of our content did not have any adult filter and was mostly after advert & rankings in contrast to this sites decade+ old agenda! phunkyfeelone wrote: Airbrushed to the scheizen and certainly not a 'model' (Zoo is NOT modelling, it's bogan chicks in lingerie for tradies to knock one out to in their lunch break). NEXT! Maybe you are getting too old for any new content on this site? The generic term Model does not imply Haute couture nor high end print/ fashion models. If i had my own bias i would not allow any model/celeb with tatts or fake boobs, just my opinion and not relevant to the big pool of what is happening out in the world. atefooterz wrote: Feb 7, 2014 "Are there any commercial shoots, to post for Ellidy? We do have a site rule about models being commercial models " Surely there's got to be some kind of minimum requirement, I know I've gone down this road before and hit a dead end, but a general assumption of a model would be fashion\cosmetics\TV (ie. game show models) etc., not soft porn strippers for lads mags. (ate) As previously stated Model is a generic term, take it up with Zoo Picture etc...

Page 1 of 2	All times are UTC + 10 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/