| Message |
|
Author |
|
 by cmack22 » Sat May 04, 2013 11:41 pm
Kylie Whyte zoo covergirl scans of most recent shoot for Zoo Magazine
(apologies for poor scans best I could do with the equipment I have)
any other photos/scans would be appreciated
M 639x826 887
L 1700x2338 813
M 574x1156 826
M 343x1167 717
M 459x1169 620
|
3
|
cmack22
Selma Bouvier
Joined: Mon Feb 01, 2010 11:14 am
Posts: 42 Karma: 111.90 (47 thanks)
|
| Sat May 04, 2013 11:41 pm |
|
|
|
by cmack22 » Thu Apr 03, 2014 12:44 am
Kylie has also done a video with model Serena bailey for MINX babes in which they both appear topless I am unable to download the video from Serena Bailey's Tumblr page any one who could would be greatly appreciated
|
1
|
cmack22
Selma Bouvier
Joined: Mon Feb 01, 2010 11:14 am
Posts: 42 Karma: 111.90 (47 thanks)
|
| Thu Apr 03, 2014 12:44 am |
|
|
|
by Roundabout » Thu Apr 03, 2014 7:51 am
Links removed at subject's request - admin
|
3
|
Roundabout
Lionel Hutz
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2010 6:42 pm
Posts: 499 Karma: 634.67 (3167 thanks)
|
| Thu Apr 03, 2014 7:51 am |
|
|
|
by Roundabout » Thu Apr 03, 2014 3:58 pm
I was planning on getting some work done today, but instead was looking at pictures of Kylie Whyte.
S 500x429 445
M 776x1080 620
S 720x503 627
L 600x903 576
S 480x720 699
S 520x720 503
S 432x1296 532
M 576x864 676
M 576x864 563
M 600x900 526
M 510x765 500
S 600x889 504
S 344x516 481
S 400x600 469
M 570x900 468
M 280x420 520
M 458x500 446
M 458x500 465
S 458x500 400
S 458x500 415
S 458x500 406
M 683x1024 437
L 735x1024 439
S 393x500 517
S 500x429 503
S 458x500 483
S 458x500 582
S 550x600 489
S 458x500 461
S 458x500 485
S 458x500 421
|
3
|
Roundabout
Lionel Hutz
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2010 6:42 pm
Posts: 499 Karma: 634.67 (3167 thanks)
|
| Thu Apr 03, 2014 3:58 pm |
|
|
|
by phunkyfeelone » Thu Apr 03, 2014 4:07 pm
Airbrushed to the scheizen and certainly not a 'model' (Zoo is NOT modelling, it's bogan chicks in lingerie for tradies to knock one out to in their lunch break). NEXT! 
|
1
|
phunkyfeelone
Martin Prince
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2004 2:59 pm
Posts: 3318 Karma: 239.78 (7956 thanks)
Location: The Land of Chocolate
|
| Thu Apr 03, 2014 4:07 pm |
|
|
|
by Roundabout » Thu Apr 03, 2014 4:44 pm
phunkyfeelone wrote: Airbrushed to the scheizen and certainly not a 'model' (Zoo is NOT modelling, it's bogan chicks in lingerie for tradies to knock one out to in their lunch break). NEXT! Dude! It's like you know me! you're going to hate my next post then....
|
3
|
Roundabout
Lionel Hutz
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2010 6:42 pm
Posts: 499 Karma: 634.67 (3167 thanks)
|
| Thu Apr 03, 2014 4:44 pm |
|
|
|
by Roundabout » Thu Apr 03, 2014 4:46 pm
Edit: removed
Last edited by Roundabout on Mon Dec 20, 2021 3:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.
|
5
|
Roundabout
Lionel Hutz
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2010 6:42 pm
Posts: 499 Karma: 634.67 (3167 thanks)
|
| Thu Apr 03, 2014 4:46 pm |
|
|
|
by theperson » Thu Apr 03, 2014 5:05 pm
top work mate. The other bird in that shoot is sensational as well 
|
1
|
theperson
Selma Bouvier
Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2002 10:23 pm
Posts: 30 Karma: 56.67 (17 thanks)
|
| Thu Apr 03, 2014 5:05 pm |
|
|
|
by atefooterz » Thu Apr 03, 2014 5:44 pm
atefooterz wrote: NOTE: This post was reported for nudity: It is now marked as adult content & does not contain "pink bits" that are against the site rules.
NB The previous admin who deleted much of our content did not have any adult filter and was mostly after advert & rankings in contrast to this sites decade+ old agenda! phunkyfeelone wrote: Airbrushed to the scheizen and certainly not a 'model' (Zoo is NOT modelling, it's bogan chicks in lingerie for tradies to knock one out to in their lunch break). NEXT! Maybe you are getting too old for any new content on this site? The generic term Model does not imply Haute couture nor high end print/ fashion models. If i had my own bias i would not allow any model/celeb with tatts or fake boobs, just my opinion and not relevant to the big pool of what is happening out in the world.
|
|
atefooterz
Santa's Little Helper
Joined: Sat Nov 22, 2003 2:34 pm
Posts: 13946 Karma: 190.49 (26566 thanks)
Location: #nowhereman
|
| Thu Apr 03, 2014 5:44 pm |
|
|
|
by phunkyfeelone » Thu Apr 03, 2014 5:58 pm
atefooterz wrote: atefooterz wrote: NOTE: This post was reported for nudity: It is now marked as adult content & does not contain "pink bits" that are against the site rules.
NB The previous admin who deleted much of our content did not have any adult filter and was mostly after advert & rankings in contrast to this sites decade+ old agenda! phunkyfeelone wrote: Airbrushed to the scheizen and certainly not a 'model' (Zoo is NOT modelling, it's bogan chicks in lingerie for tradies to knock one out to in their lunch break). NEXT! Maybe you are getting too old for any new content on this site? The generic term Model does not imply Haute couture nor high end print/ fashion models. If i had my own bias i would not allow any model/celeb with tatts or fake boobs, just my opinion and not relevant to the big pool of what is happening out in the world. atefooterz wrote: Feb 7, 2014 "Are there any commercial shoots, to post for Ellidy? We do have a site rule about models being commercial models  " Surely there's got to be some kind of minimum requirement, I know I've gone down this road before and hit a dead end, but a general assumption of a model would be fashion\cosmetics\TV (ie. game show models) etc., not soft porn strippers for lads mags.  (ate) As previously stated Model is a generic term, take it up with Zoo Picture etc... 
|
|
phunkyfeelone
Martin Prince
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2004 2:59 pm
Posts: 3318 Karma: 239.78 (7956 thanks)
Location: The Land of Chocolate
|
| Thu Apr 03, 2014 5:58 pm |
|
|
