AusCelebs Forums

Thanks for your posts anyway Hemos. It’s a sad day when the hypocritical hall monitor bitch ring of semen agrees. No wonder the site has become a ghost town. All the best

We've got a bit of a pile-on going on, good going everyone. I didn't think this particular thread would be raising the heat to this level but now that it has, let me point you to this topic going back a number of years. Since then, nothing has changed with site rules so it's still applicable

viewtopic.php?f=73&t=19046&p=519386#p519386

Now, IMNAL so site rules are open to interpretation based on what side of the bed admin got up in the morning, how nice the weather is, how popular the celebrity is and what the moon cycle is on that particular day. Multiply that by 3 admins and 3 moderators and you will get different results from day to day but broadly speaking

- Hardcore: Explicit, unsimulated sexual intercourse and/or genital-focused imagery - not allowed
- Softcore: Primary purpose is sexual arousal; simulated sex is central - not allowed
- Artistic nudity: Focuses on artistic merit, emotion, and story; nudity is incidental or aesthetic - this is allowed

I will not be drawn into personal attacks on this topic. All I will say is lighten up everyone, there's much bigger problems in the world today.

I appreciate being mod is a thankless task but selective interpretion and differential enforcement of the rules will alway engender debate.

Not hard to find a questionable post that was not deleted, one of yours.

It's difficult to argue artistic or ethical merit in posting leaked personal pics.
If I was a mod I'd never have allowed regardless of the titillating dangly bits.

Thanks for the somewhat overdue clarification. And while you're taking the higher ground here, maybe let the guy above you know that too?

Some of the things you say on here about women are pretty disgraceful and pathetic. Of course you’re the first to run & cry to the mods when someone hurts your feelings. What a hypocrite. I’m embarrassed for you.