| Message |
|
Author |
|
 by der Meister » Tue Dec 28, 2010 7:34 pm
anyone else seen the new aami ad?
|
|
der Meister
Milhouse Van Houten
Joined: Mon Jul 05, 2010 7:51 pm
Posts: 1059 Karma: 248.16 (2628 thanks)
Location: Victoria
|
| Tue Dec 28, 2010 7:34 pm |
 
|
|
|
by critic » Tue Dec 28, 2010 8:54 pm
atefooterz wrote: der Meister wrote: anyone else seen the new aami ad?  atefooterz wrote: some nice ones in this ad  I was going to ask about her myself, actually thought I did yesterday. Must be in the other similar thread. She looks familar from somewhere 
|
|
critic
Otto Man
Joined: Fri Dec 03, 2010 2:51 pm
Posts: 813 Karma: 40.47 (329 thanks)
|
| Tue Dec 28, 2010 8:54 pm |
|
|
|
by modecko » Tue Dec 28, 2010 9:17 pm
Images removed due to ambiguity of girls age.
Post remains to keep context of discussion that follows.
Last edited by modecko on Wed Dec 29, 2010 4:08 pm, edited 1 time in total.
|
|
modecko
Judge Roy Snyder
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2002 8:42 pm
Posts: 926 Karma: 102.92 (953 thanks)
Location: South Coast NSW
|
| Tue Dec 28, 2010 9:17 pm |
|
|
|
by atefooterz » Tue Dec 28, 2010 9:35 pm
i have not posted that ABC thingy as i bet they are both 15 & 11 months old ..as Murphy seems to do! 
|
|
atefooterz
Santa's Little Helper
Joined: Sat Nov 22, 2003 2:34 pm
Posts: 14025 Karma: 191.72 (26889 thanks)
Location: #nowhereman
|
| Tue Dec 28, 2010 9:35 pm |
|
|
|
by der Meister » Tue Dec 28, 2010 11:28 pm
atefooterz wrote: der Meister wrote: anyone else seen the new aami ad? atefooterz wrote: some nice ones in this ad cheers man
|
|
der Meister
Milhouse Van Houten
Joined: Mon Jul 05, 2010 7:51 pm
Posts: 1059 Karma: 248.16 (2628 thanks)
Location: Victoria
|
| Tue Dec 28, 2010 11:28 pm |
|
|
|
by modecko » Wed Dec 29, 2010 5:52 am
atefooterz wrote: i have not posted that ABC thingy as i bet they are both 15 & 11 months old ..as Murphy seems to do! I pondered over what their ages would be as they look around 18 to me but know that many teen girls can easily look older than they are. I reasoned that Aunty would have used 18+ actors or they would have used young girls that were clearly preteen. Having said that the promo seems to be aimed at preteen girls so I'll leave it up to you as to whether you want to delete the post or not, or if someone can ID the girls that would be ideal.
|
|
modecko
Judge Roy Snyder
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2002 8:42 pm
Posts: 926 Karma: 102.92 (953 thanks)
Location: South Coast NSW
|
| Wed Dec 29, 2010 5:52 am |
|
|
|
by atefooterz » Wed Dec 29, 2010 2:53 pm
modecko wrote: atefooterz wrote: i have not posted that ABC thingy as i bet they are both 15 & 11 months old ..as Murphy seems to do! I pondered over what their ages would be as they look around 18 to me but know that many teen girls can easily look older than they are. I reasoned that Aunty would have used 18+ actors or they would have used young girls that were clearly preteen. Having said that the promo seems to be aimed at preteen girls so I'll leave it up to you as to whether you want to delete the post or not, or if someone can ID the girls that would be ideal. Quote: Wiki ( quoting ABC press release )The channel's programming runs from 6:00am to 9:00pm daily, and targets the 6 – 15 year old age group.[6] It broadcasts a range of genres, including comedy, drama, music, animation, extreme sports, wildlife and news-based programmes. The channel aims to feature at least 50% Australian produced content.[7] Studio 3 is a show that is hosted by the ABC 3 presenters and link various other programs. It began on Monday 7 December 2009 at 7:00 am. Note:"clothed or swimwear" female minimum age, to post on AusCelebs, is 16. Any nude or sexually sugestive material is strictly 18+ ONLY , to be rules compliant for our site and suits the majority of international laws.
|
|
atefooterz
Santa's Little Helper
Joined: Sat Nov 22, 2003 2:34 pm
Posts: 14025 Karma: 191.72 (26889 thanks)
Location: #nowhereman
|
| Wed Dec 29, 2010 2:53 pm |
|
|
|
by modecko » Wed Dec 29, 2010 4:14 pm
Removed the images due to girls ages not being known and the possibility they might be under 16.
As I have been a long time supporter of this board only posting images of girls 18 and over, and I know this has been dropped to 16, I have also removed the vid and caps from my computer as well.
Damn it's hard to tell their ages. From now on if there is any doubt I won't even cap in the first instance.
|
|
modecko
Judge Roy Snyder
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2002 8:42 pm
Posts: 926 Karma: 102.92 (953 thanks)
Location: South Coast NSW
|
| Wed Dec 29, 2010 4:14 pm |
|
|
|
by atefooterz » Wed Dec 29, 2010 7:15 pm
Itz a nightmare sussing ages, you can see why bouncers now check id of all punters entering premises. The older days were easier as 20 to30 year olds mostly played teens ( like 90210 & even class of 1974 etc ).
|
|
atefooterz
Santa's Little Helper
Joined: Sat Nov 22, 2003 2:34 pm
Posts: 14025 Karma: 191.72 (26889 thanks)
Location: #nowhereman
|
| Wed Dec 29, 2010 7:15 pm |
|
|
|
by Reb » Thu Dec 30, 2010 12:24 pm
Reb wrote: anyone cap the latest lynx add the chick in the denim shorts  guess one just has to do somethings himself
M 1920x1088 883
M 1920x1088 652
|
|
Reb
Mary Bailey
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2001 3:39 pm
Posts: 720 Karma: 152.22 (1096 thanks)
Location: The Overflow .
|
| Thu Dec 30, 2010 12:24 pm |
|
|
