| Message |
|
Author |
|
 by Dreamkitty » Sun Nov 15, 2009 5:43 am
Indianna has a beautiful face she just needs to lay of the tan and makeup, naturally she is a very beautiful young woman!
|
|
Dreamkitty
Todd Flanders
Joined: Thu Jun 05, 2008 7:00 pm
Posts: 259 Karma: 3.47 (9 thanks)
|
| Sun Nov 15, 2009 5:43 am |
|
|
|
by eldiablo » Sun Nov 15, 2009 8:18 am
|
|
eldiablo
Milhouse Van Houten
Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2004 1:58 am
Posts: 1236 Karma: 49.51 (612 thanks)
|
| Sun Nov 15, 2009 8:18 am |
|
|
|
by Dreamkitty » Mon Nov 16, 2009 1:39 am
I love Indianna's old pics more she looked more natural 
|
|
Dreamkitty
Todd Flanders
Joined: Thu Jun 05, 2008 7:00 pm
Posts: 259 Karma: 3.47 (9 thanks)
|
| Mon Nov 16, 2009 1:39 am |
|
|
|
by eldiablo » Mon Nov 16, 2009 10:44 am
|
|
eldiablo
Milhouse Van Houten
Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2004 1:58 am
Posts: 1236 Karma: 49.51 (612 thanks)
|
| Mon Nov 16, 2009 10:44 am |
|
|
|
by sunshine! » Mon Nov 16, 2009 4:14 pm
I dont think Indi goes over the top with the make-up and her tan does look pretty natural, it is pretty warm in Aus so it might be real lol some people are just naturally tanned, especially in the warmer months. But if it is fake it still looks good, not orange looking like some people  from http://mahalofashion.blogspot.com/Indiana Evans in Christopher Kane for Topshop. Definitely my favorite at this event, she NAILED it. this is the dress http://static.guim.co.uk/sys-images/Lif ... ph-002.jpglooks better on Indi though 
S 382x675 490
|
|
sunshine!
Rod Flanders
Joined: Sun Mar 22, 2009 3:05 pm
Posts: 150 Karma: 2.67 (4 thanks)
|
| Mon Nov 16, 2009 4:14 pm |
|
|
|
by meperson » Mon Nov 16, 2009 5:22 pm
Charlotte's better looking.
|
|
meperson
Carl Carlson
Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 11:02 pm
Posts: 522 Karma: 22.22 (116 thanks)
|
| Mon Nov 16, 2009 5:22 pm |
|
|
|
by tablecalm » Mon Nov 16, 2009 10:59 pm
meperson wrote: Charlotte's better looking. I've always hated the moles and rubbish on charlotte's face. Should get them removed like dokic did.
|
|
tablecalm
Ralph Wiggum
Joined: Mon Aug 28, 2006 3:12 am
Posts: 75 Karma: 6.67 (5 thanks)
|
| Mon Nov 16, 2009 10:59 pm |
|
|
|
by meperson » Tue Nov 17, 2009 3:45 am
tablecalm wrote: meperson wrote: Charlotte's better looking. I've always hated the moles and rubbish on charlotte's face. Should get them removed like dokic did. They don't bother me because they are not huge and don't draw attention to any less than attractive facial feature as they perhaps did with Dokic.
|
|
meperson
Carl Carlson
Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 11:02 pm
Posts: 522 Karma: 22.22 (116 thanks)
|
| Tue Nov 17, 2009 3:45 am |
|
|
|
by eldiablo » Wed Nov 18, 2009 8:14 pm
|
|
eldiablo
Milhouse Van Houten
Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2004 1:58 am
Posts: 1236 Karma: 49.51 (612 thanks)
|
| Wed Nov 18, 2009 8:14 pm |
|
|
|
by Kymsarse » Thu Nov 19, 2009 12:29 am
meperson wrote: tablecalm wrote: meperson wrote: Charlotte's better looking. I've always hated the moles and rubbish on charlotte's face. Should get them removed like dokic did. They don't bother me because they are not huge and don't draw attention to any less than attractive facial feature Sorry, but she's covered in them and they totally ruin her looks. She is a naturally very pretty girl but definately does need them removed.
|
|
Kymsarse
Monty Burns
Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2004 8:14 pm
Posts: 53 Karma: 7.55 (4 thanks)
|
| Thu Nov 19, 2009 12:29 am |
|
|
