| Message |
|
Author |
|
 by Macc » Fri May 27, 2011 4:54 pm
solz wrote: I think it's probably more due to BOT activity (resulting from the slight increase in advertisements), rather than banned users. SLIGHT increase?????
|
|
Macc
Milhouse Van Houten
Joined: Mon Nov 29, 2004 4:28 pm
Posts: 1555 Karma: 31.96 (497 thanks)
Location: A small planet somewhere in the vicinity of Betelgeuse
|
| Fri May 27, 2011 4:54 pm |
|
|
|
by salt » Fri May 27, 2011 5:45 pm
Macc wrote: SLIGHT increase????? Typo, now fixed.
|
|
salt
Milhouse Van Houten
Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:56 pm
Posts: 1490 Karma: 168.93 (2517 thanks)
|
| Fri May 27, 2011 5:45 pm |
|
|
|
by HumphreyBBear » Fri May 27, 2011 6:11 pm
Macc wrote: solz wrote: I think it's probably more due to BOT activity (resulting from the slight increase in advertisements), rather than banned users. SLIGHT increase????? Please don't let this thread dissolve into a debate about Ads. I think we should stick to the topic. I agree with Macc's point about a review of active Mods, and whether more Mods are required. A Mod's availability changes over time, as real life always throws up new challenges. I still believe this change would make all Mod's lives easier.
|
|
HumphreyBBear
Carl Carlson
Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 638 Karma: 47.34 (302 thanks)
|
| Fri May 27, 2011 6:11 pm |
|
|
|
by salt » Fri May 27, 2011 6:31 pm
IF this were to go ahead, how would the new mods be selected?
- Will the most suitable users as decided by the existing mods/admins be chosen;
- Will becoming a mod be subject to a user expressing interest to an existing mod/admin;
- Would a poll topic being established with a number of users as options, where users can vote on who they'd like to be new mods; or
- Would it be a combination of some or all of the above?
|
|
salt
Milhouse Van Houten
Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:56 pm
Posts: 1490 Karma: 168.93 (2517 thanks)
|
| Fri May 27, 2011 6:31 pm |
|
|
|
by SKaVeN » Sat May 28, 2011 3:53 pm
Well, it's not a democracy. It's a privately owned enterprise owned & operated by (an) individual who, therefore, has the right to appoint whomever s/he likes - without being obliged to justify his/her decision to general members (who get to use the board for free). 
|
|
SKaVeN
Ned Flanders
Joined: Thu Aug 25, 2005 11:51 pm
Posts: 2066 Karma: 2.57 (53 thanks)
Location: Adelaide
|
| Sat May 28, 2011 3:53 pm |
|
|
|
by Macc » Sat May 28, 2011 9:27 pm
Agreed. This place isn't a democracy and becoming a mod isn't a popularity contest. While the owner has the right to make anybody a mod for any reason, in theory it's whoever is best able to do the job.
|
|
Macc
Milhouse Van Houten
Joined: Mon Nov 29, 2004 4:28 pm
Posts: 1555 Karma: 31.96 (497 thanks)
Location: A small planet somewhere in the vicinity of Betelgeuse
|
| Sat May 28, 2011 9:27 pm |
|
|
|
by wolverine » Mon May 30, 2011 12:38 am
We have noticed an unusual spike in number of spam posts in the last few weeks (we are the ones who clean them, after all).
There has been some debate between admins and mods about how to best deal with the issue. One of us is usually around once every few hours but going through the motions of banning spammers is slow and frustrating process. In addition to improving registration process to stop bots from registering, we are having to deal with human spammers in third world countries who just sit there, create accounts and spam the forums. After some deliberation, we have decided to start blocking known spam IP ranges to see if it makes any significant difference. This has been going on for about 10 days now and I would like to think that number of spam messages is decreasing.
I would in particular like to thank our admin mr_walker, who has been very active in blocking these IP ranges.
|
|
wolverine
Capo Bastone
Joined: Thu Sep 05, 2002 7:26 am
Posts: 2865 Karma: 253.30 (7257 thanks)
|
| Mon May 30, 2011 12:38 am |
|
|
|
by Emma Frost » Wed Jul 13, 2011 2:29 am
That's topical...
|
|
Emma Frost
Barney Gumble
Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2003 2:42 pm
Posts: 354 Karma: 1.69 (6 thanks)
Location: Melbourne, Australia.
|
| Wed Jul 13, 2011 2:29 am |
|
|
|
by RoyalFitch98 » Tue Jul 19, 2011 6:53 am
I will just take that into account subsequent time!
[url=http://www.spamspamspam.cum[/url] :)
|
|
RoyalFitch98
Maggie's Pacifier
Joined: Tue Jul 19, 2011 6:42 am
Posts: 1 Karma: none
Location: Syria
|
| Tue Jul 19, 2011 6:53 am |
 
|
|
|
by atefooterz » Tue Jul 19, 2011 9:54 am
|
|
atefooterz
Santa's Little Helper
Joined: Sat Nov 22, 2003 1:34 pm
Posts: 13932 Karma: 172.62 (24050 thanks)
Location: #nowhereman
|
| Tue Jul 19, 2011 9:54 am |
|
|
