| Message |  | Author | 
        
			| 
				
				
				  by narly » Tue Jun 12, 2012 7:06 pm
 
 In the market for a new tele , thought I might go all out and go for a 3d model . Have a few questions . 1. Passive or active 3d , what's the difference ? 2. Cheapy or quality brand ( eg. panasonic) ? Been looking at Samsung , Panasonic or even this http://www.kogan.com/au/buy/46-led-tv-3D-full-hd-pvr/ I purchased a Kogan for the van quite a few years ago , and has been a reliable unit , but it's not in use everyday . The 3d glasses seem to be another story again   Your thoughts please
 
 |  | narly Troy McLure 
					Karma: 474.76 (203040 thanks)Joined: Thu Feb 12, 2004 7:56 pm
 Posts: 42767
 Location: Radelaide
   | 
		
			| Tue Jun 12, 2012 7:06 pm | 
					
					   | 
	
	
		|  | 
	
			| 
				
				
				  by Macc » Tue Jun 12, 2012 7:09 pm
 
 Why bother with 3D? The broadcasters aren't supporting it. 
 
 |  | Macc Milhouse Van Houten 
					Karma: 44.62 (730 thanks)Joined: Mon Nov 29, 2004 5:28 pm
 Posts: 1637
 Location: A small planet somewhere in the vicinity of Betelgeuse
   | 
		
			| Tue Jun 12, 2012 7:09 pm | 
					
					   | 
	
	
		|  | 
	
			| 
				
				
				  by narly » Tue Jun 12, 2012 7:17 pm
 
 I know that , just looking at the DVD side of things . 
 
 |  | narly Troy McLure 
					Karma: 474.76 (203040 thanks)Joined: Thu Feb 12, 2004 7:56 pm
 Posts: 42767
 Location: Radelaide
   | 
		
			| Tue Jun 12, 2012 7:17 pm | 
					
					   | 
	
	
		|  | 
	
			| 
				
				
				  by sharkboi » Tue Jun 12, 2012 9:08 pm
 
 Good Q narly, I'm interested in answers to this as well...
 The only thing I know is that I have one friend with a Panasonic Vietta(?) and it's sharp as a tack, and one friend with a Samsung model which doesn't look as good.
 I have no idea about the differences between Plasma and LCD etc etc
 
 
 |  | sharkboi Troy McLure 
					Karma: 295.38 (78167 thanks)Joined: Sat Mar 21, 2009 10:11 am
 Posts: 26463
 Location: At my computer
   | 
		
			| Tue Jun 12, 2012 9:08 pm | 
					
					   | 
	
	
		|  | 
	
			| 
				
				
				  by HumphreyBBear » Wed Jun 13, 2012 12:21 am
 
 narly wrote: 1. Passive or active 3d , what's the difference ?Here's a reasonable explanation:  http://www.pcworld.com/article/225218/active_3d_vs_passive_3d.html I'm cautious about going 3D just yet.  The technology is still too young, and the range of 3D movies is limited. I'll be holding off till the next generation comes around, when glasses are not required, and picture quality improves.
 
 |  | HumphreyBBear Otto Man 
					Karma: 85.51 (667 thanks)Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2005 7:45 pm
 Posts: 781
   | 
		
			| Wed Jun 13, 2012 12:21 am | 
					
					   | 
	
	
		|  | 
	
			| 
				
				
				  by SKaVeN » Wed Jun 13, 2012 3:16 pm
 
 3D-TV.... I don't reckon it's even "3D" anyway.  The objects do appear to be at different distances but they still look flat, like looking at a range of objects painted on a series of flat glass panels... And the glasses!  Oh the glasses!  Just the idea of having to wear dark glasses in your own lounge room to watch TV seems odd to me.  And what if you have guests?  Do you let them wear the glasses or do you wear them?  If the former, what if there aren't enough glasses for all your guests?  Or are we all supposed to keep our own pair of glasses in the car in case we're somewhere & end up watching a DVD? I got my tellybox ten years ago.  It was the last big screen 'TV' Sony made before they went over the LCDs.  Beautiful picture.  I reckon it's still better than the picture on the LCDs they have in the shops now. I think for 3D TV to really catch on it needs two factors.  It needs to be BIG!  Not much point trying to immerse oneself into a 3D world with an ordinary sized screen.  And NO GLASSES but they are working on that.  I saw an advert for one of those portable gamer things that has it so it's coming.  Reckon I'll wait 'til then. Sorry for hijacking your thread, Narlz.    
 
 |  | SKaVeN Ned Flanders 
					Karma: 3.15 (65 thanks)Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2005 12:51 am
 Posts: 2065
 Location: Adelaide
   | 
		
			| Wed Jun 13, 2012 3:16 pm | 
					
					   | 
	
	
		|  | 
	
			| 
				
				
				  by narly » Wed Jun 13, 2012 4:31 pm
 
 Thanks for the link Humph , made up my mind that 3D won't be a necessity . I allreay wear glasses so the thought of wearing 2 pair at the same time is very off putting . Down to the shops now i spose to compare picture quality . 
 
 |  | narly Troy McLure 
					Karma: 474.76 (203040 thanks)Joined: Thu Feb 12, 2004 7:56 pm
 Posts: 42767
 Location: Radelaide
   | 
		
			| Wed Jun 13, 2012 4:31 pm | 
					
					   | 
	
	
		|  | 
	
			| 
				
				
				  by narly » Sun Jun 24, 2012 7:36 pm
 
 Well an expensive sunday , settled on a 47" Panasonic ( Panasonic Viera TH-L47ET5A 47" Full HD 3D LED LCD TV ). Wasn't after 3d , but a local Adelaide retailer had this model on sale at a very reasonable price . First impressions  
 
 |  | narly Troy McLure 
					Karma: 474.76 (203040 thanks)Joined: Thu Feb 12, 2004 7:56 pm
 Posts: 42767
 Location: Radelaide
   | 
		
			| Sun Jun 24, 2012 7:36 pm | 
					
					   | 
	
	
		|  | 
	
			| 
				
				
				  by narly » Sun Jul 08, 2012 8:54 pm
 
 Further to , I rented a 3D movie to try out this 3D stuff & I must say I was pleasantly surprised . Wearing the glasses was not uncomfortable & the effect was quite amazing , I never thought it would be as good as it was . Very happy with my new tele   
 
 |  | narly Troy McLure 
					Karma: 474.76 (203040 thanks)Joined: Thu Feb 12, 2004 7:56 pm
 Posts: 42767
 Location: Radelaide
   | 
		
			| Sun Jul 08, 2012 8:54 pm | 
					
					   | 
	
	
		|  | 
	
			| 
				
				
				  by aka Aussie is back » Fri Sep 06, 2013 11:00 pm
 
 I have has a 3D for 18 months +, great, wouldn't hesitate to buy 3D again, mine is a Voxson Plasma 
 
 |  | aka Aussie is back Elizabeth Hoover 
					Karma: 364.23 (448 thanks)Joined: Thu Jun 06, 2013 7:02 pm
 Posts: 123
   | 
		
			| Fri Sep 06, 2013 11:00 pm | 
					
					   | 
	
	
		|  |