Celebrities We Hate, and Why.
Message |
|
Author |
by Emma Frost » Thu Jan 08, 2009 3:53 pm
Hehe, nice.
She also claims to never have taken drugs yet are are many pictures (that I'm not allowed to post here) that clearly show her both smoking pot and inhaling coke.
She also claims that the paparazzi are bad, bad people.
Ironicall, perhaps stupidly, she uses them to further her own unscrupulous needs whenever the urge takes her.
She's horrid, and a liar.
Good call bully. 
|
|
Emma Frost
Barney Gumble
Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2003 3:42 pm Posts: 354 Karma: 1.69 (6 thanks) Location: Melbourne, Australia.
|
Thu Jan 08, 2009 3:53 pm |
|
 |
by restorannyuk » Sun Jan 11, 2009 1:10 am
Emma Frost wrote: I kinda don't mind Warnie. Must admit that I am mellowing in my attitude to Warnie. I think, maybe, he's learnt the errors of his ways. As for DzaR's other picks, I must agree with him/her: once a woman beater, ALWAYS a woman beater. The Bulldogs thing, though, wasn't ever proven. That, as the legal people say, is "Heresay": as worthwhile as gossip. Emma Frost wrote: - Tom Cruise: I'm not sure I really need to explain this one. This guy is just a dick. I loathe him.
I'm waiting for L. Ron Hubbard's "Second Coming". He will arrive on one of the Psycho-Toll-ogists YouFoes, and they can all bugger off back to whatever Universe Of Unadulterated Tripe they came from. Emma Frost wrote: - Aston Kutcher: My friend used to make me watch Punk'd. What's with this kid? He's got ADD right? Even his name is annoying. Thinks he is funnier/cooler than he actually is. Why would you even bother hiring him and his crappy Kabbalah bracelet, I'm sure Josh Hartnett would appreciate the work. "Punk'd" is for Punks. "Jackass" is for "You don't got Jack". Emma Frost wrote: - Robin Williams: Another one for the " thinks he's funnier than he is" category. Or perhaps he was never funny. Being doing the same manic shtick for 40 years. Past his prime, washed up hack. I can only take so much of Robin Williams. His manic workings make me wanna throw a gumboot at my TV, but some of his more serious acting work is quite good. Emma Frost wrote: Wil Anderson: Obnoxious little turd he is. Not only content to be lame when he's on TV, he's just as annoying in print form. Why do the ABC keep putting Wil Anderson, that 100% loser, on TV? Guess it's because he's cheap. I sent an email to ABC's "Media Watch" about Wil Anderson's most recent excuse for a TV show. I will quote y'all the major part of my message to them: "I'd like some enlightenment from you, if possible, Media Watch, in regards the ABC television show, "The Gruen Transfer". The ABC isn't supposed to promote any sort of advertising, aside from its own content. How, then, is "The Gruen Transfer" allowed to appear on the ABC? It is a half hour show dedicated to the world of advertising. It shows advertisements and products from various companies around the world, and includes a panel of Australian advertising "experts" who spend the entire show spruiking for their own advertising agencies. How does "The Gruen Transfer" NOT infringe the ABC's advertising standards? Any explanation in regards this matter should be greatly appreciated." I sent that to "Media Watch" on the 28th July, 2008. Aint heard back from them yet. It must have gotten "lost" in their "spam" (?). bullwinkle wrote: It's true. Look up 'dickhead' in the dictionary and you'll see a picture of Alan Jones. Hmm. Maybe Alan Jones learnt his lesson with that cancer scare he had recently. Maybe ...(?). You certainly couldn't make me listen to his radio show. I'd poke my eardrums out if anyone tried. Emma Frost wrote: I'm not particularly fond of Andrew Denton. Something about him puts me off. Perhaps it's that in between his top lip and nose is always shiny for some odd reason. It glistens. And is weird.  Denton is EVIL! Do you know why he has cancelled his "Enough Rope" show? To save himself further embarrassment. I am hinting at something that will come to the public's attention about Denton, sometime in the not-too-distant future, that should have him put in a gaol cell - if Australia can find a non-corrupt magistrate to hear the proceedings (mysteriousness!  Gossip?). SKaVeN wrote: Angela Bishop!!! Poor Angela! She can't get a real job, so she's stuck as an Entertainment Reporter. Crockle wrote: Kevin Rudd.
You aint gonna fool me, Kevvy. You're a clone of John Howard. John Howard is an Angel Of Heaven. Rudd is Satan's doppleganger. Emma Frost wrote: Sugar Tits
She also has the innate ability to totally not recognize, or care about the other viewpoint at all. Or the plight of any civilians caught up in the mix.
Now, I don't profess to be a political scientist, or even know what I'm on about, but to me Israel is behaving much like the Nazis did in WWII.
"We will not compromise on Hamas." Sound familiar?
*sigh*
My sentiments about the Israelis are the same as yours, Emma.
Here is a little "art" I created about a year ago:
Image deleted. Mr Walker*
|
|
restorannyuk
Karma: 2.01 (9 thanks)
|
Sun Jan 11, 2009 1:10 am |
|
 |
by restorannyuk » Sun Jan 11, 2009 1:37 am
Hamish & Andy:
Typical example of Australia's "youth commando" comics.
They are as humorous, intelligent and original as triple j radio/ triple j television/music video clips.

|
|
restorannyuk
Karma: 2.01 (9 thanks)
|
Sun Jan 11, 2009 1:37 am |
|
 |
by restorannyuk » Sun Jan 11, 2009 1:56 am
DzaR wrote: Paul McDermott ... Angry, angry, angry little man. He seems to think that jokes about or relating to the anus are the wittiest and highest form of high-brow sophisticate humour, and so are the only jokes really worth telling.
Yes. If you could be bothered to look through his catalogue of what he would call "humour", you will certainly find an overwhelmingly scarily repetitiousness of references to the anus, and alleged humour thereof.
That process is called "Content Analysis" in Media Studies terminology.
Freud would have some interesting things to say about those results.
I will just say that McSperm-It is fascinated with the asshole simply because he is one.
|
|
restorannyuk
Karma: 2.01 (9 thanks)
|
Sun Jan 11, 2009 1:56 am |
|
 |
by SKaVeN » Sun Jan 11, 2009 2:38 am
Yup! No Doubt about it. DzaR/Crockle = ItAintMeBait
Methinks there's going to be a lot more posts like all this on C & W.
 I don't think cj's going to be too thrilled to see you back...
EDIT: Anyway, do you not think that Jewish Australians who are members or visitors of this site might get a bit upset about being called Nazis? And the site could get closed down & the owners possibly even get sued...
But, to give the issue some more perspective, technically the Jews did not invade Palestine. The Palestinians agreed to let the Jews return to the Holy Land as per the result of third party negotiates instigated by the British government.
What our ancestors did out here is more on par with an invasion than what the Jews did because, unlike the Jews, they didn't ask the current inhabitants' (ie: the aborigines) permission first &, unlike the Jews, they had no previous claim of which to refer. In other words; people in glasshouses should not throw stones.
The reason that what was once Palestine is now mostly Israel is the result of the Palestinians losing a war with the Jews which they started - twice! Sure, Palestine ended up with a bad deal but it's not unusual for a nation that starts a war & subsequently loses it to then lose territory as per the terms of their surrender. And it wasn't until after the second time it happened territory was taken. Look at the armistice Germany was forced to sign after WWI. If you keep poking a snake with a short stick you will get bitten...
|
|
SKaVeN
Ned Flanders
Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2005 12:51 am Posts: 2065 Karma: 3.15 (65 thanks) Location: Adelaide
|
Sun Jan 11, 2009 2:38 am |
|
 |
by restorannyuk » Mon Jan 12, 2009 5:26 am
Read The Book Of Revelations sometime, SKaVeN, and I also refer you to Farakhan, if you can't figure head nor tail of what I say.
I understand you found my artwork too difficult to contemplate, and so deleted it. This aint my website.
All I was doing was making a political point. You may find it offensive. I don't. I find the views of others offensive at times too, but that's how the world is.
So, it's okay to be racist against Muslims (post 9/11 Western Governments and Mass Media), but as soon as someone makes a little hint of some Jewish people being nasty types themselves, there's threats of legal action and calls of anti-Semitism.
That's only a tiny part of the point I made with those (now deleted) pictures.
I agree with your point about the Aborigines of Australia, SKaVeN, but believe me, I don't live in any glasshouse and I aint throwing stones either.
All I did was make a POLITICAL POINT using "Icons".
I am a man of The Catholic Church. I have seen images of our Sacred Cross, Jesus, Mary, and our Popes desecrated in similar ways to what you allege I have done to the Star Of David.
I haven't ever jumped up and down, threatening to sue anyone about it, and neither have the Catholic Church.
As soon as anyone hints at some nastiness about some modern Jews, though, it's "off with their heads!".
I will end off here with this statement, that will more than likely see me banned from this website that caters for non-thinking adults:
How long will the modern Jewish people keep using Adolf Hitler as an excuse for all of the evil that the modern Jews perpetrate in the modern world?
P.S. Magnificent anti-Palestinian propaganda (disguised as a silly argument to try to hide the lies of others that you foolishly follow) that you've come up with.
|
|
restorannyuk
Karma: 2.01 (9 thanks)
|
Mon Jan 12, 2009 5:26 am |
|
 |
by SKaVeN » Mon Jan 12, 2009 1:56 pm
I understood your point, Crocky, but could you understand mine?
All I was doing was illustrating that the arrival of the Jews in the region cannot be defined as an "invasion" when they were given permission & let's not forget that it was the Jews who were driven out of the land in the first place. I think it's a big call for a white Australian with their own history to accuse anyone else's race of procuring their home by any process that they would call an "invasion". Some might even call it hypocrisy.
You deleted them? I thought one of the mods did Sunday afternoon?
I accept your religious position & no I have not read any of those particular texts but I am not a religious person so I was speaking purely from a historical point of view & not trying to make it a religious discussion.
I don't consider myself to be a non-thinker & I don't really think making a personal remark about me (the depth of my range of thinking could not possible be known to you) so I'd much rather we stay on the topic rather than one person making assumptions about the other.
Crocky, all I did was give a brief history of the region & why the boundaries have come to exist they way they do. I didn't see anything that I would term as anti-Palestinian propaganda but, if I did, what was it? The only aspect of this discussion that I would deem as propaganda would be those icons that the mod (or you) removed anyway.
I'm not defending Israel's behaviour but I do think it is a gross simplification & more elemental of personal opinion that makes it possible to blame the whole situation over there entirely one one side, albeit whether Israel & Palestine.
ItAintMeBait wrote: How long will the modern Jewish people keep using Adolf Hitler as an excuse for all of the evil that the modern Jews perpetrate in the modern world?
It's not very surprising that you expected to get banned after posting something like that as most sites probably would...
"all of the evil that the modern Jews perpetrate in the modern world?"
...is virtually an exact quote of what Hitler believed & all the justification that he believed he needed to instigate the persecution, the concentration camps & Final Solution. It is a belief that the KKK, the skinheads & various neo-Nazi movements still share today. Can we really afford to start aligning our own opinion with theirs? Just the thought of that is quite unsettling to me.
It's just propaganda designed to appeal to peoples natural fear, mistrust & paranoia ofg someone or something that is different.
Personally, I don't believe in the evil plan of the Jews any more than the evil plans of the Secret Government, the Freemasons, the Illuminati or the shape-shifting reptilian aliens.
What I have read about the history of the nation/s has made me impartial but, unfortunately, there are other people out there who will see a discussion like this & just use it as an excuse to voice their own racial preferences.
There are some very interesting message boards that have discussions of this & other nature where many people go to discuss such issues & which are more qualified to host these discussions. I visit some of them myself but I personally think that the subject is too controversial, complicated, potentially harmful &, in fact, not even relevant for an Australian Celebrity site. Put it this way, I wouldn't go to one of those sites & expect too many of them to participate in a discussion about Australian celebrities.
The problem with getting annoyed with people being "un-thinking" their lack of involvement in a discussion like this is because it's like being annoyed at the regulars in the H20 thread for not discussing the 7.30 Report. Not to suggest the people round there here parts don't ever want to discuss the bigger issues, they just don't come to have them at a celebrity site.
Suggestion: Have you a YouTube account? Mate, I spend a heck of a lot more time posting discussing & arguing there as it's a more larger & more global & diverse community. That's where I go for all the bigger issues & then I just go to the celebrity fan sites for a perve, a stir & the shits & giggles. 
Last edited by SKaVeN on Mon Jan 12, 2009 5:22 pm, edited 2 times in total.
|
|
SKaVeN
Ned Flanders
Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2005 12:51 am Posts: 2065 Karma: 3.15 (65 thanks) Location: Adelaide
|
Mon Jan 12, 2009 1:56 pm |
|
 |
by Emma Frost » Mon Jan 12, 2009 3:59 pm
ItAintMeBait wrote: Emma Frost wrote: Sugar Tits
She also has the innate ability to totally not recognize, or care about the other viewpoint at all. Or the plight of any civilians caught up in the mix.
Now, I don't profess to be a political scientist, or even know what I'm on about, but to me Israel is behaving much like the Nazis did in WWII.
"We will not compromise on Hamas." Sound familiar?
*sigh* My sentiments about the Israelis are the same as yours, Emma. Here is a little "art" I created about a year ago: Image deleted. Mr Walker*
I'm not sure if our sentiments about this subject are actually aligned at all.
While I'm glad to see you back Crockle/Dzar, if indeed it is you, your misdirected rage is a lil' unnerving.
Yes, I am upset about what Israel is currently perpetrating upon the Palestinian people.
It's not cool.
That doesn't mean I think what Hitler did was cool or justified.
It doesn't make antisemitism cool either.
If you actually read my post you would see that I totally used what the Nazi's did as a bad thing.
I get upset whenever someone, or somegroup, abuses the power they wield over another less able/influential person/group.
We're all just people dude. No 'one' group is better than the rest.
Why hate?
Well, not the pretty, spoiled, angry, bitch group.
We're so totally 'better' than most, but aside from us, everyone else is all the same and should be treated as such. 
|
|
Emma Frost
Barney Gumble
Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2003 3:42 pm Posts: 354 Karma: 1.69 (6 thanks) Location: Melbourne, Australia.
|
Mon Jan 12, 2009 3:59 pm |
|
 |
by UpOver » Mon Jan 12, 2009 9:18 pm
Frankly, I think fundamentalists of any religion are a threat to any rational and progressive society.
|
|
UpOver
Monty Burns
Joined: Tue Feb 11, 2003 4:15 pm Posts: 50 Karma: 14.00 (7 thanks) Location: Massachusetts, USA
|
Mon Jan 12, 2009 9:18 pm |
|
 |
by SKaVeN » Mon Jan 12, 2009 9:26 pm
I agree.
|
|
SKaVeN
Ned Flanders
Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2005 12:51 am Posts: 2065 Karma: 3.15 (65 thanks) Location: Adelaide
|
Mon Jan 12, 2009 9:26 pm |
|
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum
|
|