Thoughts on Female News Reporters threads
Message |
|
Author |
by atefooterz » Fri Dec 06, 2013 5:33 pm
Laxative Effect wrote: So, do you mean...
Female news reporters (Seven) " (Nine) " (Ten) (ABC) (sbs) (Cable) ^This NOTE: The blonde hottie sky news lass on ten early/wakeup would go in whatever capped chanel...and by that stage get her own thread
|
|
atefooterz
Santa's Little Helper
Joined: Sat Nov 22, 2003 2:34 pm Posts: 14025 Karma: 190.39 (26702 thanks) Location: #nowhereman
|
Fri Dec 06, 2013 5:33 pm |
|
|
by sharkboi » Fri Dec 06, 2013 6:21 pm
As to the Female News Reporters threads, most of them should have their own threads instead of being all lumped in one thread, most of them are regularly posted by various posters, and members would then be able to see new posts of their favourites when they happen more easily, instead of having to go into the current thread and search for them. As to whether the networks are separated doesn't bother me at all, because I don't navigate the site that way, and I wouldn't even notice. I never go through the threads in sections, I only use the active topics to see what's new or not, and I have it bookmarked... search.php?search_id=active_topicsThen if I want to post I start typing in the search box, all my regular posting threads then pop up when I start typing, I click on the thread I want and post.
|
|
sharkboi
Troy McLure
Joined: Sat Mar 21, 2009 10:11 am Posts: 26527 Karma: 294.21 (78044 thanks) Location: At my computer
|
Fri Dec 06, 2013 6:21 pm |
|
|
by phunkyfeelone » Fri Dec 06, 2013 6:54 pm
If it's just for the randoms, then sure.
But if you plan to bury the ones like Sam Armytage, etc. under Channel 7 > Sam Armytage, makes it a bit annoying.
|
|
phunkyfeelone
Martin Prince
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2004 2:59 pm Posts: 3296 Karma: 238.44 (7859 thanks) Location: The Land of Chocolate
|
Fri Dec 06, 2013 6:54 pm |
|
|
by atefooterz » Fri Dec 06, 2013 7:15 pm
phunkyfeelone wrote: If it's just for the randoms, then sure.
But if you plan to bury the ones like Sam Armytage, etc. under Channel 7 > Sam Armytage, makes it a bit annoying. You have been too busy fapping to read the original post properly .... actually "someone" being helpful by changing the name of this thread & re jigging has brung it (informed discussion) undone and now chaos worthy haha! Discuss if we should maybe break up the Female News Reporters - v2 thread into one for each Network ?
|
|
atefooterz
Santa's Little Helper
Joined: Sat Nov 22, 2003 2:34 pm Posts: 14025 Karma: 190.39 (26702 thanks) Location: #nowhereman
|
Fri Dec 06, 2013 7:15 pm |
|
|
by Laxative Effect » Fri Dec 06, 2013 8:26 pm
Ate is going to lose it soon.
|
|
Laxative Effect
Larry Burns
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 4:46 pm Posts: 3645 Karma: 181.43 (6613 thanks) Location: Melbourne
|
Fri Dec 06, 2013 8:26 pm |
|
|
by phunkyfeelone » Fri Dec 06, 2013 8:42 pm
atefooterz wrote: phunkyfeelone wrote: If it's just for the randoms, then sure.
But if you plan to bury the ones like Sam Armytage, etc. under Channel 7 > Sam Armytage, makes it a bit annoying. You have been too busy fapping to read the original post properly .... actually "someone" being helpful by changing the name of this thread & re jigging has brung it (informed discussion) undone and now chaos worthy haha! Discuss if we should maybe break up the Female News Reporters - v2 thread into one for each Network ?Sssshhhh I hear you, I hear you I get it, you want to put everyone in alphabetical order, sheesh...
|
|
phunkyfeelone
Martin Prince
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2004 2:59 pm Posts: 3296 Karma: 238.44 (7859 thanks) Location: The Land of Chocolate
|
Fri Dec 06, 2013 8:42 pm |
|
|
by atefooterz » Fri Dec 06, 2013 8:53 pm
phunkyfeelone wrote: atefooterz wrote: phunkyfeelone wrote: If it's just for the randoms, then sure.
But if you plan to bury the ones like Sam Armytage, etc. under Channel 7 > Sam Armytage, makes it a bit annoying. You have been too busy fapping to read the original post properly .... actually "someone" being helpful by changing the name of this thread & re jigging has brung it (informed discussion) undone and now chaos worthy haha! Discuss if we should maybe break up the Female News Reporters - v2 thread into one for each Network ?Sssshhhh I hear you, I hear you I get it, you want to put everyone in alphabetical order, sheesh... No matey, i wish to make it easier for folks to find faves & save myself about 6 hours every so often hunting around that thread to see who has enough following & posts for their own thread
|
|
atefooterz
Santa's Little Helper
Joined: Sat Nov 22, 2003 2:34 pm Posts: 14025 Karma: 190.39 (26702 thanks) Location: #nowhereman
|
Fri Dec 06, 2013 8:53 pm |
|
|
by sharkboi » Fri Dec 06, 2013 8:59 pm
atefooterz wrote: phunkyfeelone wrote: If it's just for the randoms, then sure.
But if you plan to bury the ones like Sam Armytage, etc. under Channel 7 > Sam Armytage, makes it a bit annoying. You have been too busy fapping to read the original post properly .... actually "someone" being helpful by changing the name of this thread & re jigging has brung it (informed discussion) undone and now chaos worthy haha! Discuss if we should maybe break up the Female News Reporters - v2 thread into one for each Network ?Not only Network threads, but a lot of them need to be separated into their own threads, instead of being all lumped together. Let's say anyone who has been posted more than a few times gets their own thread. After all that, a lot of the females in the 'Female politicians' thread need to be separated into their own threads too!
|
|
sharkboi
Troy McLure
Joined: Sat Mar 21, 2009 10:11 am Posts: 26527 Karma: 294.21 (78044 thanks) Location: At my computer
|
Fri Dec 06, 2013 8:59 pm |
|
|
by narly » Fri Dec 06, 2013 9:02 pm
phunkyfeelone wrote: Sssshhhh I hear you, I hear you I get it, you want to put everyone in alphabetical order, sheesh... NO he doesn't. you're not listening people . Those that have their own threads will stay as is ........... got that ? The Female News Reporters - v2 will be become defunct (eventually)and replaced by Channel 7 reporters Channel 9 reporters Channel 10 reporters ABC reporters SBS reporters If any particular reporter becomes popular enough then they will get their own thread ! Well I think that's Ate's thought's anyway , at least that's what I was thinking.
|
|
narly
Troy McLure
Joined: Thu Feb 12, 2004 7:56 pm Posts: 40209 Karma: 493.18 (198302 thanks) Location: Radelaide
|
Fri Dec 06, 2013 9:02 pm |
|
|
by phunkyfeelone » Fri Dec 06, 2013 9:12 pm
narly wrote: phunkyfeelone wrote: Sssshhhh I hear you, I hear you I get it, you want to put everyone in alphabetical order, sheesh... NO he doesn't. you're not listening people . Those that have their own threads will stay as is ........... got that ? The Female News Reporters - v2 will be become defunct (eventually)and replaced by Channel 7 reporters Channel 9 reporters Channel 10 reporters ABC reporters SBS reporters If any particular reporter becomes popular enough then they will get their own thread ! Well I think that's Ate's thought's anyway , at least that's what I was thinking. I knew i'd get at least one bite
|
|
phunkyfeelone
Martin Prince
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2004 2:59 pm Posts: 3296 Karma: 238.44 (7859 thanks) Location: The Land of Chocolate
|
Fri Dec 06, 2013 9:12 pm |
|
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum
|
|