| Message |
|
Author |
|
 by cmack22 » Sat May 04, 2013 11:41 pm
Kylie Whyte zoo covergirl scans of most recent shoot for Zoo Magazine
(apologies for poor scans best I could do with the equipment I have)
any other photos/scans would be appreciated
M 639x826 801
L 1700x2338 735
M 574x1156 732
M 343x1167 639
M 459x1169 556
|
2
|
cmack22
Selma Bouvier
Joined: Mon Feb 01, 2010 11:14 am
Posts: 42 Karma: 104.76 (44 thanks)
|
| Sat May 04, 2013 11:41 pm |
|
|
|
by cmack22 » Thu Apr 03, 2014 12:44 am
Kylie has also done a video with model Serena bailey for MINX babes in which they both appear topless I am unable to download the video from Serena Bailey's Tumblr page any one who could would be greatly appreciated
|
1
|
cmack22
Selma Bouvier
Joined: Mon Feb 01, 2010 11:14 am
Posts: 42 Karma: 104.76 (44 thanks)
|
| Thu Apr 03, 2014 12:44 am |
|
|
|
by Roundabout » Thu Apr 03, 2014 7:51 am
Links removed at subject's request - admin
|
3
|
Roundabout
Lionel Hutz
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2010 6:42 pm
Posts: 491 Karma: 624.24 (3065 thanks)
|
| Thu Apr 03, 2014 7:51 am |
|
|
|
by Roundabout » Thu Apr 03, 2014 3:58 pm
I was planning on getting some work done today, but instead was looking at pictures of Kylie Whyte.
S 500x429 384
M 776x1080 527
S 720x503 549
L 600x903 498
S 480x720 598
S 520x720 419
S 432x1296 444
M 576x864 576
M 576x864 465
M 600x900 452
M 510x765 427
S 600x889 432
S 344x516 416
S 400x600 397
M 570x900 389
M 280x420 447
M 458x500 379
M 458x500 386
S 458x500 331
S 458x500 345
S 458x500 335
M 683x1024 363
L 735x1024 365
S 393x500 443
S 500x429 441
S 458x500 394
S 458x500 508
S 550x600 421
S 458x500 396
S 458x500 417
S 458x500 346
|
3
|
Roundabout
Lionel Hutz
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2010 6:42 pm
Posts: 491 Karma: 624.24 (3065 thanks)
|
| Thu Apr 03, 2014 3:58 pm |
|
|
|
by phunkyfeelone » Thu Apr 03, 2014 4:07 pm
Airbrushed to the scheizen and certainly not a 'model' (Zoo is NOT modelling, it's bogan chicks in lingerie for tradies to knock one out to in their lunch break). NEXT! 
|
|
phunkyfeelone
Martin Prince
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2004 2:59 pm
Posts: 3295 Karma: 238.21 (7849 thanks)
Location: The Land of Chocolate
|
| Thu Apr 03, 2014 4:07 pm |
|
|
|
by Roundabout » Thu Apr 03, 2014 4:44 pm
phunkyfeelone wrote: Airbrushed to the scheizen and certainly not a 'model' (Zoo is NOT modelling, it's bogan chicks in lingerie for tradies to knock one out to in their lunch break). NEXT! Dude! It's like you know me! you're going to hate my next post then....
|
3
|
Roundabout
Lionel Hutz
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2010 6:42 pm
Posts: 491 Karma: 624.24 (3065 thanks)
|
| Thu Apr 03, 2014 4:44 pm |
|
|
|
by Roundabout » Thu Apr 03, 2014 4:46 pm
Edit: removed
Last edited by Roundabout on Mon Dec 20, 2021 3:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.
|
5
|
Roundabout
Lionel Hutz
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2010 6:42 pm
Posts: 491 Karma: 624.24 (3065 thanks)
|
| Thu Apr 03, 2014 4:46 pm |
|
|
|
by theperson » Thu Apr 03, 2014 5:05 pm
top work mate. The other bird in that shoot is sensational as well 
|
|
theperson
Selma Bouvier
Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2002 10:23 pm
Posts: 30 Karma: 51.61 (16 thanks)
|
| Thu Apr 03, 2014 5:05 pm |
|
|
|
by atefooterz » Thu Apr 03, 2014 5:44 pm
atefooterz wrote: NOTE: This post was reported for nudity: It is now marked as adult content & does not contain "pink bits" that are against the site rules.
NB The previous admin who deleted much of our content did not have any adult filter and was mostly after advert & rankings in contrast to this sites decade+ old agenda! phunkyfeelone wrote: Airbrushed to the scheizen and certainly not a 'model' (Zoo is NOT modelling, it's bogan chicks in lingerie for tradies to knock one out to in their lunch break). NEXT! Maybe you are getting too old for any new content on this site? The generic term Model does not imply Haute couture nor high end print/ fashion models. If i had my own bias i would not allow any model/celeb with tatts or fake boobs, just my opinion and not relevant to the big pool of what is happening out in the world.
|
|
atefooterz
Santa's Little Helper
Joined: Sat Nov 22, 2003 2:34 pm
Posts: 14025 Karma: 190.29 (26690 thanks)
Location: #nowhereman
|
| Thu Apr 03, 2014 5:44 pm |
|
|
|
by phunkyfeelone » Thu Apr 03, 2014 5:58 pm
atefooterz wrote: atefooterz wrote: NOTE: This post was reported for nudity: It is now marked as adult content & does not contain "pink bits" that are against the site rules.
NB The previous admin who deleted much of our content did not have any adult filter and was mostly after advert & rankings in contrast to this sites decade+ old agenda! phunkyfeelone wrote: Airbrushed to the scheizen and certainly not a 'model' (Zoo is NOT modelling, it's bogan chicks in lingerie for tradies to knock one out to in their lunch break). NEXT! Maybe you are getting too old for any new content on this site? The generic term Model does not imply Haute couture nor high end print/ fashion models. If i had my own bias i would not allow any model/celeb with tatts or fake boobs, just my opinion and not relevant to the big pool of what is happening out in the world. atefooterz wrote: Feb 7, 2014 "Are there any commercial shoots, to post for Ellidy? We do have a site rule about models being commercial models  " Surely there's got to be some kind of minimum requirement, I know I've gone down this road before and hit a dead end, but a general assumption of a model would be fashion\cosmetics\TV (ie. game show models) etc., not soft porn strippers for lads mags.  (ate) As previously stated Model is a generic term, take it up with Zoo Picture etc... 
|
|
phunkyfeelone
Martin Prince
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2004 2:59 pm
Posts: 3295 Karma: 238.21 (7849 thanks)
Location: The Land of Chocolate
|
| Thu Apr 03, 2014 5:58 pm |
|
|
