AusCelebs Forums https://forums.auscelebs.net/ |
|
Caitlin Stasey https://forums.auscelebs.net/viewtopic.php?f=75&t=12443 |
Page 64 of 91 |
Author: | der Meister [ Sun Apr 02, 2017 7:54 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Caitlin Stasey |
It's on the previous page mate. |
Author: | Username: [ Fri Apr 07, 2017 6:42 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Caitlin Stasey |
meperson wrote: jcox394 wrote: daily mail article about how she had an abortion http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/ar ... tance.html Women's rights but not baby's rights - says it all really. Who wouldn't want to unscrew that defective lightbulb? Wierdos like her shouldn't be allowed to procreate, and if by chance, you accidentally filled her unwashed, hairy, oyster-donut with your precious, life giving, pearly, man-jam, you'd definitely want her surgically vacuumed out, before she could spew forth a hybrid, human-feminist abomination that, male or bitch, would be taught to loath itself, almost as much as it loathed you and the thing that spat it out. Best to consign any of its rotten loin fruit to the abortion bucket, before it becomes another quasi-activist, man hating, colon mouthed, stupidly ideallistic, "femanist"! |
Author: | atefooterz [ Fri Apr 07, 2017 8:18 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Caitlin Stasey |
^Ahh a good old school Aus C style post. :) #cavemenroolz |
Author: | phunkyfeelone [ Fri Apr 07, 2017 9:10 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Caitlin Stasey |
Username: wrote: meperson wrote: jcox394 wrote: daily mail article about how she had an abortion http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/ar ... tance.html Women's rights but not baby's rights - says it all really. Who wouldn't want to unscrew that defective lightbulb? Wierdos like her shouldn't be allowed to procreate, and if by chance, you accidentally filled her unwashed, hairy, oyster-donut with your precious, life giving, pearly, man-jam, you'd definitely want her surgically vacuumed out, before she could spew forth a hybrid, human-feminist abomination that, male or bitch, would be taught to loath itself, almost as much as it loathed you and the thing that spat it out. Best to consign any of its rotten loin fruit to the abortion bucket, before it becomes another quasi-activist, man hating, colon mouthed, stupidly ideallistic, "femanist"! Who hurt you Username:, who hurt you? |
Author: | Betelgeuse [ Sat Apr 08, 2017 12:57 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Caitlin Stasey |
you lurked for 15 years and thats your first post? a bigoted rant? |
Author: | Gr81 [ Sat Apr 08, 2017 1:39 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Caitlin Stasey |
Is he saying he wouldn't put one in her??? I call bs. Keep posting, she's got a sweet rack. She doesn't need to talk lol |
Author: | lovesfitcelebs [ Sat Apr 08, 2017 3:35 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Caitlin Stasey |
Let's hope post 2 is in another 15 years. Everytime this thread gets updated I hope it's for some of her T&A. |
Author: | atefooterz [ Sat Apr 08, 2017 6:26 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Caitlin Stasey |
Betelgeuse wrote: you lurked for 15 years and thats your first post? a bigoted rant? Not a lurker just using a sock, her post style may be rather familiar to the oldies of V1- V2 webby board days. |
Author: | ringofyre [ Sat Apr 08, 2017 9:02 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Caitlin Stasey |
I may not have expressed it in the same way as whichever sockpuppet Username is but... the delicious irony of Caitlin getting her kit off regularly for feminisim is a delight to the eyes and honestly, with no consequences (to my family life & marriage for example) I'd happily bounce those buns given the opportunity and willingness. However would I willing commit to a lifetime of shared parental responsibilities? There is not a barge-pole long enough... Gentle reminder that there is a reason that pic related exists. |
Author: | atefooterz [ Fri Apr 14, 2017 1:30 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Caitlin Stasey |
Page 64 of 91 | All times are UTC + 10 hours [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |