| Message |
|
Author |
|
 by atefooterz » Tue Dec 03, 2013 7:00 pm
Laxative Effect wrote: I'd be guessing it's for the people with the foot fetishes. There is a heap of shots by off duty Ramsay streeters trecking around... these are actually partof that (shooed & unshoed lol)
|
|
atefooterz
Santa's Little Helper
Joined: Sat Nov 22, 2003 2:34 pm
Posts: 14025 Karma: 190.40 (26703 thanks)
Location: #nowhereman
|
| Tue Dec 03, 2013 7:00 pm |
 
|
|
|
by narly » Tue Dec 03, 2013 7:03 pm
wolverine wrote: Laxative Effect wrote: I'd be guessing it's for the people with the foot fetishes. Those can go elsewhere for their kicks. Not gonna happen here. Agreed , can't see the point in those pics unless there in a series of caps from the same segment/show where there's facial recognition as well.
|
|
narly
Troy McLure
Joined: Thu Feb 12, 2004 7:56 pm
Posts: 40238 Karma: 493.26 (198428 thanks)
Location: Radelaide
|
| Tue Dec 03, 2013 7:03 pm |
|
|
|
by achre » Wed Dec 04, 2013 5:17 pm
narly wrote: wolverine wrote: Laxative Effect wrote: I'd be guessing it's for the people with the foot fetishes. Those can go elsewhere for their kicks. Not gonna happen here. Agreed , can't see the point in those pics unless there in a series of caps from the same segment/show where there's facial recognition as well. Speaking for the foot fetishes, I fail to see how three (fairly small) picture updates on a celebrity I wouldn't otherwise follow can be so taxing on your bandwidth as to make it against the rules. Fairly pedantic seeing how it's plainly Jane Hall (in her thread and from her official twitter).
|
|
achre
Snowball
Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2011 6:12 pm
Posts: 6 Karma: none
|
| Wed Dec 04, 2013 5:17 pm |
|
|
|
by wolverine » Wed Dec 04, 2013 6:35 pm
This particular example is not about bandwidth or space - it's about relevance and general direction and usability of the forum. I can't tell that is Jane Hall and I am certainly not going to be following her twitter or instagram to make sure it is. But most importantly, this will not become a foot-fetish forum. Some reasonable degree of that is allowed but this example was all about feet and as this forum is not called AusCelebsFeet, it crosses the line in my mind.
But this also touches on a bigger issue being played out lately - with all these celebs having instagram and twitter accounts posting pictures that are of little value artistically or stylistically, forums are being flooded by one picture posts that are pushing better quality content further down the thread. I for one dislike opening threads for some celebrities around here and finding hazy, blurry and otherwise useless selfies that come straight down from their instagram account. Occasionally there are some pictures worth uploading but most are not. So admins and mods will discuss and decide on how to best address this issue.
|
|
wolverine
Capo Bastone
Joined: Thu Sep 05, 2002 8:26 am
Posts: 3823 Karma: 324.12 (12391 thanks)
|
| Wed Dec 04, 2013 6:35 pm |
|
|
|
by narly » Wed Dec 04, 2013 7:00 pm
wolverine wrote: This particular example is not about bandwidth or space - it's about relevance and general direction and usability of the forum. I can't tell that is Jane Hall and I am certainly not going to be following her twitter or instagram to make sure it is. But most importantly, this will not become a foot-fetish forum. Some reasonable degree of that is allowed but this example was all about feet and as this forum is not called AusCelebsFeet, it crosses the line in my mind.
But this also touches on a bigger issue being played out lately - with all these celebs having instagram and twitter accounts posting pictures that are of little value artistically or stylistically, forums are being flooded by one picture posts that are pushing better quality content further down the thread. I for one dislike opening threads for some celebrities around here and finding hazy, blurry and otherwise useless selfies that come straight down from their instagram account. Occasionally there are some pictures worth uploading but most are not. So admins and mods will discuss and decide on how to best address this issue. here here , wot he said 
|
1
|
narly
Troy McLure
Joined: Thu Feb 12, 2004 7:56 pm
Posts: 40238 Karma: 493.26 (198428 thanks)
Location: Radelaide
|
| Wed Dec 04, 2013 7:00 pm |
|
|
|
by kirkbright » Thu Dec 05, 2013 11:31 am
Seconded 
|
|
kirkbright
Carl Carlson
Joined: Sat Jun 14, 2008 6:57 am
Posts: 651 Karma: 23.20 (151 thanks)
|
| Thu Dec 05, 2013 11:31 am |
|
|
|
by atefooterz » Thu Dec 05, 2013 5:35 pm
M 1024x576 212
|
2
|
atefooterz
Santa's Little Helper
Joined: Sat Nov 22, 2003 2:34 pm
Posts: 14025 Karma: 190.40 (26703 thanks)
Location: #nowhereman
|
| Thu Dec 05, 2013 5:35 pm |
|
|
|
by huntingu » Sun Dec 29, 2013 4:14 am
Looking quite busty from the 2-3 seconds she was in the new Neighbours 2014 sneak peek video, cant wait to see her back on the tele even if it is only for a few weeks
|
|
huntingu
Todd Flanders
Joined: Sat Feb 12, 2011 10:45 am
Posts: 254 Karma: 43.70 (111 thanks)
|
| Sun Dec 29, 2013 4:14 am |
|
|
|
by atefooterz » Thu Jan 23, 2014 5:12 pm
huntingu wrote: Looking quite busty from the 2-3 seconds she was in the new Neighbours 2014 sneak peek video, cant wait to see her back on the tele even if it is only for a few weeks 
M 1024x576 380
|
3
|
atefooterz
Santa's Little Helper
Joined: Sat Nov 22, 2003 2:34 pm
Posts: 14025 Karma: 190.40 (26703 thanks)
Location: #nowhereman
|
| Thu Jan 23, 2014 5:12 pm |
|
|
|
by Idon'tbelieveit » Sun Jan 26, 2014 2:02 am
M 968x1017 186
S 501x532 400
|
1
|
Idon'tbelieveit
Frank Grimes
Joined: Sun Apr 05, 2009 8:53 pm
Posts: 4714 Karma: 36.68 (1729 thanks)
Location: UK
|
| Sun Jan 26, 2014 2:02 am |
|
|
