AusCelebs Forums :: View topic - Thoughts on Female News Reporters threads

Laxative Effect wrote:

So, do you mean...

Female news reporters (Seven)
" (Nine)
" (Ten)
(ABC)
(sbs)
(Cable)

phunkyfeelone wrote:

If it's just for the randoms, then sure.

But if you plan to bury the ones like Sam Armytage, etc. under Channel 7 > Sam Armytage, makes it a bit annoying.

atefooterz wrote:

phunkyfeelone wrote:

If it's just for the randoms, then sure.

But if you plan to bury the ones like Sam Armytage, etc. under Channel 7 > Sam Armytage, makes it a bit annoying.

You have been too busy fapping to read the original post properly :lol:

.... actually "someone" being helpful by changing the name
of this thread & re jigging has brung it (informed discussion) undone and now chaos worthy haha!

Discuss if we should maybe break up the Female News Reporters - v2 thread into one for each Network ?

phunkyfeelone wrote:

atefooterz wrote:

phunkyfeelone wrote:

If it's just for the randoms, then sure.

But if you plan to bury the ones like Sam Armytage, etc. under Channel 7 > Sam Armytage, makes it a bit annoying.

You have been too busy fapping to read the original post properly :lol:

.... actually "someone" being helpful by changing the name
of this thread & re jigging has brung it (informed discussion) undone and now chaos worthy haha!

Discuss if we should maybe break up the Female News Reporters - v2 thread into one for each Network ?

Sssshhhh I hear you, I hear you :roll:

I get it, you want to put everyone in alphabetical order, sheesh...

atefooterz wrote:

phunkyfeelone wrote:

If it's just for the randoms, then sure.

But if you plan to bury the ones like Sam Armytage, etc. under Channel 7 > Sam Armytage, makes it a bit annoying.

You have been too busy fapping to read the original post properly :lol:

.... actually "someone" being helpful by changing the name
of this thread & re jigging has brung it (informed discussion) undone and now chaos worthy haha!

Discuss if we should maybe break up the Female News Reporters - v2 thread into one for each Network ?

phunkyfeelone wrote:

Sssshhhh I hear you, I hear you :roll:

I get it, you want to put everyone in alphabetical order, sheesh...

narly wrote:

phunkyfeelone wrote:

Sssshhhh I hear you, I hear you :roll:

I get it, you want to put everyone in alphabetical order, sheesh...

NO he doesn't. you're not listening people .
Those that have their own threads will stay as is ........... got that ?
The Female News Reporters - v2 will be become defunct (eventually)and replaced by
Channel 7 reporters
Channel 9 reporters
Channel 10 reporters
ABC reporters
SBS reporters
If any particular reporter becomes popular enough then they will get their own thread !
Well I think that's Ate's thought's anyway , at least that's what I was thinking.

Author:	atefooterz [ Fri Dec 06, 2013 5:33 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Thoughts on Female News Reporters threads
Laxative Effect wrote: So, do you mean... Female news reporters (Seven) " (Nine) " (Ten) (ABC) (sbs) (Cable) ^This NOTE: The blonde hottie sky news lass on ten early/wakeup would go in whatever capped chanel...and by that stage get her own thread

Author:	sharkboi [ Fri Dec 06, 2013 6:21 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Thoughts on Female News Reporters threads
As to the Female News Reporters threads, most of them should have their own threads instead of being all lumped in one thread, most of them are regularly posted by various posters, and members would then be able to see new posts of their favourites when they happen more easily, instead of having to go into the current thread and search for them. As to whether the networks are separated doesn't bother me at all, because I don't navigate the site that way, and I wouldn't even notice. I never go through the threads in sections, I only use the active topics to see what's new or not, and I have it bookmarked... search.php?search_id=active_topics Then if I want to post I start typing in the search box, all my regular posting threads then pop up when I start typing, I click on the thread I want and post.

Author:	phunkyfeelone [ Fri Dec 06, 2013 6:54 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Thoughts on Female News Reporters threads
If it's just for the randoms, then sure. But if you plan to bury the ones like Sam Armytage, etc. under Channel 7 > Sam Armytage, makes it a bit annoying.

Author:	atefooterz [ Fri Dec 06, 2013 7:15 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Thoughts on Female News Reporters threads
phunkyfeelone wrote: If it's just for the randoms, then sure. But if you plan to bury the ones like Sam Armytage, etc. under Channel 7 > Sam Armytage, makes it a bit annoying. You have been too busy fapping to read the original post properly .... actually "someone" being helpful by changing the name of this thread & re jigging has brung it (informed discussion) undone and now chaos worthy haha! Discuss if we should maybe break up the Female News Reporters - v2 thread into one for each Network ?

Author:	Laxative Effect [ Fri Dec 06, 2013 8:26 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Thoughts on Female News Reporters threads
Ate is going to lose it soon.

AusCelebs Forums https://forums.auscelebs.net/

Thoughts on Female News Reporters threads https://forums.auscelebs.net/viewtopic.php?f=73&t=19044	Page 2 of 4

Author:	phunkyfeelone [ Fri Dec 06, 2013 8:42 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Thoughts on Female News Reporters threads
atefooterz wrote: phunkyfeelone wrote: If it's just for the randoms, then sure. But if you plan to bury the ones like Sam Armytage, etc. under Channel 7 > Sam Armytage, makes it a bit annoying. You have been too busy fapping to read the original post properly .... actually "someone" being helpful by changing the name of this thread & re jigging has brung it (informed discussion) undone and now chaos worthy haha! Discuss if we should maybe break up the Female News Reporters - v2 thread into one for each Network ? Sssshhhh I hear you, I hear you I get it, you want to put everyone in alphabetical order, sheesh...

Author:	atefooterz [ Fri Dec 06, 2013 8:53 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Thoughts on Female News Reporters threads
phunkyfeelone wrote: atefooterz wrote: phunkyfeelone wrote: If it's just for the randoms, then sure. But if you plan to bury the ones like Sam Armytage, etc. under Channel 7 > Sam Armytage, makes it a bit annoying. You have been too busy fapping to read the original post properly .... actually "someone" being helpful by changing the name of this thread & re jigging has brung it (informed discussion) undone and now chaos worthy haha! Discuss if we should maybe break up the Female News Reporters - v2 thread into one for each Network ? Sssshhhh I hear you, I hear you I get it, you want to put everyone in alphabetical order, sheesh... No matey, i wish to make it easier for folks to find faves & save myself about 6 hours every so often hunting around that thread to see who has enough following & posts for their own thread

Author:	sharkboi [ Fri Dec 06, 2013 8:59 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Thoughts on Female News Reporters threads
atefooterz wrote: phunkyfeelone wrote: If it's just for the randoms, then sure. But if you plan to bury the ones like Sam Armytage, etc. under Channel 7 > Sam Armytage, makes it a bit annoying. You have been too busy fapping to read the original post properly .... actually "someone" being helpful by changing the name of this thread & re jigging has brung it (informed discussion) undone and now chaos worthy haha! Discuss if we should maybe break up the Female News Reporters - v2 thread into one for each Network ? Not only Network threads, but a lot of them need to be separated into their own threads, instead of being all lumped together. Let's say anyone who has been posted more than a few times gets their own thread. After all that, a lot of the females in the 'Female politicians' thread need to be separated into their own threads too!

Author:	narly [ Fri Dec 06, 2013 9:02 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Thoughts on Female News Reporters threads
phunkyfeelone wrote: Sssshhhh I hear you, I hear you I get it, you want to put everyone in alphabetical order, sheesh... NO he doesn't. you're not listening people . Those that have their own threads will stay as is ........... got that ? The Female News Reporters - v2 will be become defunct (eventually)and replaced by Channel 7 reporters Channel 9 reporters Channel 10 reporters ABC reporters SBS reporters If any particular reporter becomes popular enough then they will get their own thread ! Well I think that's Ate's thought's anyway , at least that's what I was thinking.

Author:	phunkyfeelone [ Fri Dec 06, 2013 9:12 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Thoughts on Female News Reporters threads
narly wrote: phunkyfeelone wrote: Sssshhhh I hear you, I hear you I get it, you want to put everyone in alphabetical order, sheesh... NO he doesn't. you're not listening people . Those that have their own threads will stay as is ........... got that ? The Female News Reporters - v2 will be become defunct (eventually)and replaced by Channel 7 reporters Channel 9 reporters Channel 10 reporters ABC reporters SBS reporters If any particular reporter becomes popular enough then they will get their own thread ! Well I think that's Ate's thought's anyway , at least that's what I was thinking. I knew i'd get at least one bite

Page 2 of 4	All times are UTC + 10 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/